Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DataViking-Tech/Althing --skill focus-groupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DataViking-Tech/AlthingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dataviking-tech/althing/focus-group)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dataviking-tech/althing/focus-group"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dataviking-tech/althing/focus-group/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dataviking-tech/althing/focus-group"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dataviking-tech/althing/focus-group.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00945 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00378 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
focus-group scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are orchestrating a synthetic focus group using the althing MCP tools.
What You Do
You help the user design and run synthetic focus groups — structured qualitative research using AI-powered personas. You handle the full workflow:
- Understand the research question — What does the user want to learn?
- Define personas — Assemble a list of realistic, diverse participants.
- Design the instrument — Write targeted questions and follow-ups.
- Run the panel — Execute the focus group via MCP tools.
- Synthesize results — Summarize findings, identify patterns, and highlight insights.
Available MCP Tools
mcp__althing__run_prompt— Send a single prompt to an LLM (no personas). Use for a quick smoke test before building a panel.mcp__althing__run_panel— Run a full panel: passpersonas(an inline list of persona dicts) plus one question source — inlinequestions, an inlineinstrumentdict, or aninstrument_packname.mcp__althing__list_persona_packs— List saved persona packs you can reuse viarun_panel'spack_id.mcp__althing__list_instrument_packs— List installed instrument packs you can reference viarun_panel'sinstrument_pack.
These MCP tools take inline data or pack names, not file paths. Personas are a JSON list; instruments are an inline dict or an installed pack name. There is no "load this YAML path" argument — read any file yourself and pass its contents inline.
Workflow
Step 1: Clarify the Research Goal
Ask the user what they want to test. Examples:
- "What do people think of the name 'Traitprint' for a career app?"
- "How would different demographics react to this pricing page?"
- "Pre-screen this survey before we send it to real participants."
Step 2: Assemble Personas
Build a list of 3-6 diverse personas. Each persona is a dict with:
name(required),age,occupationbackground— 2-3 sentences of life contextpersonality_traits— 3-5 traits that shape their perspective
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 78fec5eed54d
focus-group is a skill published in the GitHub repository DataViking-Tech/Althing (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 945 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
deepeval
DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; send results to Confident AI…
deepeval-otel
Export raw OpenTelemetry traces from an AI application to Confident AI's Observatory. TRIGGER when the user wants to send OpenTelemetry or OTLP traces/spans from an LLM app, agent, RAG pipeline, or chatbot to Confident AI; configure the Confident AI OTLP endpoint; set confident.span. or confident.trace. attributes…
deepeval-tracing
Instrument an AI application with DeepEval's native tracing so its behavior is visible in Confident AI. TRIGGER when the user wants to add DeepEval tracing or @observe to an LLM app, agent, RAG pipeline, or chatbot; wire a framework, model-provider, or vector-database integration (LangGraph, LangChain, OpenAI Agents…
source-ingest
Normalize a raw source — PDF, DOCX, XLSX, URL, article text, or transcript — into a structured source record compatible with SOURCEPOLICY.md evidence modes and per-claim provenance tags. Use before analysis when the user provides a document and you need to extract metadata, classify source type, pull key excerpts, and…
agenda-intelligence
Turn public agenda, news, policy moves, geopolitical developments, sanctions, trade disputes, regulation, elections, diplomatic signals, and strategic-risk events into decision-ready briefs. Use when the user asks an agent to analyze what changed, why it matters, who is affected, what is uncertain, scenarios…
evidence-output-review
Review agent-produced claims against caller-supplied evidence before a human decides whether to relay the output.