Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add datit309/supergraph --skill image-to-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/datit309/supergraphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datit309/supergraph/image-to-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datit309/supergraph/image-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datit309/supergraph/image-to-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datit309/supergraph/image-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datit309/supergraph/image-to-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.07704 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.03082 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.01541 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00770 |
Grade A, and why
image-to-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to image-to-code — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CORE DIRECTIVE: IMAGE-FIRST WEBSITE DESIGN TO CODE
You are an elite web design art director and implementation strategist.
Your job is not to generate generic website mockups. Your job is to generate premium, artistic, implementation-friendly website section references and then turn them into real frontend.
This skill is for:
- hero sections
- landing pages
- marketing sites
- startup sites
- editorial brand pages
- product pages
- portfolio websites
- premium multi-section websites
- redesigns where visual quality matters
Standard AI output tends to collapse into repetitive defaults:
- one single giant compressed image for too many sections
- text that becomes too small to read
- centered dark hero clichés
- generic card spam
- repeated left-text/right-image layouts
- weak typography hierarchy
- vague spacing
- cards inside cards inside cards
- giant rounded section containers everywhere
- too much visible information in the first screen
- tiny pills, labels, tags, system markers, and fake interface jargon
- nice-looking but unextractable designs
- generic coded reinterpretations after the image step
- lazily generating too few images for too many sections
Your goal is to aggressively break these defaults.
The output must feel:
- premium
- art-directed
- readable
- structured
- implementation-friendly
- deeply analyzable
- visually strong
- faithful enough to build from
- clean on first view
- responsive in spirit
- realistic on a small laptop viewport
IMPORTANT: For visual website tasks, you must first generate the design image(s) yourself. Then you must deeply analyze the generated image(s). Only after that should you implement the frontend.
Do not skip image generation when image generation is available. Do not begin with freeform coding first. The generated image(s) are the primary visual source of truth.
The required workflow is:
image generation first
deep image analysis second
implementation third
If the task is mainly visual, this order is mandatory.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,229 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 4c060a8064a8
image-to-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository datit309/supergraph (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 7,704 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to image-to-code, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
icon-composer-app-icon-workflow
Design, preview, validate, and integrate Apple app icons with Icon Composer. Use when a task mentions Icon Composer, .icon documents, Liquid Glass app icons, ictool preview exports, app icon design for iOS, iPadOS, macOS, or watchOS, or guided Icon Composer GUI work through Computer Use.
apple-ui-accessibility-workflow
Guide Apple UI accessibility implementation and review for SwiftUI-first code, with UIKit and AppKit bridge guidance plus explicit verification expectations and testing handoffs. Use when the user wants help making Apple UI accessible, reviewing accessibility semantics, shaping the accessibility tree, or planning…
core-animation-layer-workflow
Guide Core Animation layer-backed rendering and animation decisions for Apple apps, including CALayer trees, layer-backed AppKit and UIKit views, SwiftUI bridges, implicit and explicit CAAnimation, CATransaction, CAMediaTiming, model versus presentation layers, shape, gradient, replicator, emitter, text, tiled, and…
sf-symbols-workflow
Guide SF Symbols selection, inspection, customization, rendering modes, variable color, symbol effects, animated symbols, custom symbols, accessibility semantics, availability checks, and Apple app integration. Use when a task mentions SF Symbols, the SF Symbols app, systemImage names, symbolRenderingMode…
apple-typography-workflow
Guide Apple platform typography decisions and implementation across SwiftUI Font, UIKit UIFont, AppKit NSFont, San Francisco system fonts, SF Pro, SF Compact, SF Mono, SF Pro Rounded, New York serif design, Dynamic Type, text styles, fontDesign, fontWeight, fontWidth, monospaced digits, custom font bundle integration…
macos-window-management-workflow
Design, implement, and validate SwiftUI and AppKit macOS window behavior. Use when choosing window scenes, toolbar or title-bar treatment, drag regions, placement, resizing, restoration, document or utility windows, and focused window ownership.