Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DauQuangThanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill git-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DauQuangThanh/hanoi-rainbowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/git-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/git-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/git-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow/git-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.01044 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00418 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
git-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Commit
Generates well-structured git commit messages following conventional commit standards and best practices.
Key Principles
- Be specific: Describe exactly what changed
- Be consistent: Follow conventional commit format
- Be atomic: One logical change per commit
- Be clear: Write for others (including future you)
- Be complete: Include why and context when needed
- Be conventional: Follow standard format for automation
Standard Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>
Components:
- type: Category of change (required) - feat, fix, docs, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, style, revert
- scope: Area affected (optional) - auth, api, ui, db, etc.
- subject: Brief description (required, ≤50 chars)
- body: Detailed explanation (optional, wrap at 72 chars)
- footer: Breaking changes, issue refs (optional)
Basic Workflow
-
Choose the commit type:
feat: New user-facing functionalityfix: Bug fix for usersdocs: Documentation onlyrefactor: Code restructuring without behavior changeperf: Performance improvementtest: Adding/updating testsbuild: Dependency/build system changesci: CI/CD configuration changeschore: Maintenance tasksstyle: Code formattingrevert: Reverting previous commit
-
Write subject line (imperative mood, ≤50 chars):
✅ feat(auth): add OAuth2 authentication ✅ fix(api): resolve race condition in user updates ❌ feat: added some stuff ❌ fix: bug fix -
Add body if needed (explain why, not just what):
- Required for breaking changes
- Recommended for complex changes
- Wrap lines at 72 characters
-
Include footer:
- Breaking changes:
BREAKING CHANGE: description - Issue references:
Closes #123,Fixes #456
- Breaking changes:
Quick Examples
Simple feature:
feat(auth): add password reset endpoint
Bug fix with context:
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/advanced-patterns.md 578 B
- references/best-practices.md 1.3 KB
- references/commit-message-convention.md 864 B
- references/commit-message-structure.md 369 B
- references/commit-message-templates.md 388 B
- references/commit-types.md 2.0 KB
- references/commit-workflow.md 835 B
- references/common-mistakes-to-avoid.md 1.1 KB
- references/common-scenarios.md 2.3 KB
- references/examples-by-project-type.md 1021 B
- references/quick-reference.md 1.0 KB
- references/team-conventions.md 250 B
- references/writing-guidelines.md 2.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 740a60e2003a
git-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository DauQuangThanh/hanoi-rainbow (17 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
speq-git-discipline
Read-only git guardrails. No history writes, verify changes before completing. Used by speq agents. Not for general git work.
next
Phase 3 of the Tripod workflow, run repeatedly. Finds the first unchecked task in TASKS.md, implements it under the rules in CLAUDE.md, verifies its "Done when" condition, checks the box, and commits. Use when the user says "next task", "continue", "keep going", or invokes /tripod:next.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
agentic-jujutsu
Quantum-resistant, self-learning version control for AI agents with ReasoningBank intelligence and multi-agent coordination.
github-automation
GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Skip when: local-only changes, non-GitHub repositories.
git-advanced-workflows
Master advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking, bisect, worktrees, and reflog to maintain clean history and recover from any situation. Use when managing complex Git histories, collaborating on feature branches, or troubleshooting repository issues.