Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah --skill supreme-project-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ahWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/supreme-project-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/supreme-project-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/supreme-project-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/supreme-project-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/supreme-project-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00148 | $0.01275 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00074 | $0.00638 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
supreme-project-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 83 lines · 148 tokens per session scan A 85c42d0c6c6d
supreme-project-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 148 tokens to every session and 1,275 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, or identifying security vulnerabilities. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions.
code-reviewer
Reviews a code diff or pull request for correctness bugs, security vulnerabilities, and quality/maintainability problems, producing severity-ranked findings with file/line references and concrete fix suggestions. Use this skill when the user asks to "review this PR", "review my diff", "code review", "look over these…
security-auditor
Audits source code against the OWASP Top 10 (2021) and produces concrete, exploitable findings with proof-of-concept, severity ratings, and copy-pasteable fixes. Use this skill when the user asks to "do a security review", "audit this code for vulnerabilities", "check for OWASP Top 10 issues", "find security bugs"…
secure-code-review
Performs a security-focused review of code or a diff, hunting for injection, broken authentication/authorization, insecure crypto, hardcoded secrets, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, path traversal, and missing input validation, with exploit scenarios and concrete fixes ranked by severity. Use this skill when the user…
developer-workflow
Use when the user is writing, reviewing, debugging, testing, or refactoring code, or wants help with commits and pull requests. Emphasizes reading existing code first, verifying changes, and never inventing APIs.
continual-learning
Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…