Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davidomil/cloudx --skill hardware-releasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidomil/cloudxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidomil/cloudx/hardware-release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidomil/cloudx/hardware-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidomil/cloudx/hardware-release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidomil/cloudx/hardware-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidomil/cloudx/hardware-release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
hardware-release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Release hardware
Design draft. A release is complete only when its saved receipt confirms release.
- Complete or stop the task's hardware work. Account for task-started background/remote work. Do not assume that a local SSH process exit stopped every remote effect.
- Close the managed connection with
node "$CLOUDX_HARDWARE_HELPER" access close --input close.json. Keep the exact current claim ID/generation. Close can settle handles in recovery but does not clear unknown effects. Inspect its receipt. - Request
release --input release.jsonwith a new requestId and the same claim reference. The service drains managed operations and executes the configured cleanup once. - Inspect
receipt --request REQUEST_ID. A lost response means inspect the same request, not issue a second release with a different identity. - Report released only after the saved outcome removes the live hold. Another tab can then acquire it if its admission statuses permit.
- If cleanup or remote outcome is unknown, report the recovery reason and claim reference. Leave the hold in place for operator reconciliation or explicit override.
Do not mark a custom status Free to use to clear a claim. Do not force release through a management endpoint. A stale claim cannot release a later owner's reservation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 18 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 725a6743b2a7
hardware-release is a skill published in the GitHub repository davidomil/cloudx (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-04.
hardware-release compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hardware-releasedavidomil/cloudx | Skill | 1 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code, Codex |
| iot-ai-tasksIoTAiTech/MC-GPT | Skill | 3 | 24d ago | none | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| iot-ai-updateIoTAiTech/MC-GPT | Skill | 3 | 24d ago | none | A | 21 | Claude Code, Codex |
| iot-ai-helpIoTAiTech/MC-GPT | Skill | 3 | 24d ago | none | A | 21 | Claude Code, Codex |
| iot-ai-settingsIoTAiTech/MC-GPT | Skill | 3 | 24d ago | none | A | 24 | Claude Code, Codex |
| batch-apiQwenLM/qwen-code | Skill | 29k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| repo-hygieneQwenLM/qwen-code | Skill | 29k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |