Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DavidROliverBA/ArchitectKB --skill dpia-statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DavidROliverBA/ArchitectKBWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidroliverba/architectkb/dpia-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidroliverba/architectkb/dpia-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidroliverba/architectkb/dpia-status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidroliverba/architectkb/dpia-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidroliverba/architectkb/dpia-status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00814 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00326 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
dpia-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DPIA Status Skill
Purpose
Generate comprehensive GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) compliance status reports across all engineering projects.
Usage
/dpia-status- Current DPIA status for all projects/dpia-status pending- Only pending/in-progress DPIAs/dpia-status project [name]- DPIA status for specific project
Instructions
When this skill is invoked:
-
Read DPIA Tracker page:
Page - DPIA Tracker.md -
Extract DPIA information:
- Projects requiring DPIA
- OneTrust IDs
- Current status (not required, threshold assessment, in progress, approved, rejected)
- Submission dates
- Approvers
- Risk levels
- Follow-up owners
-
Find all projects with DPIA requirements using Grep:
pattern: "DPIA" output: files_with_matches -
Read relevant project files to get:
- Project status and timeline
- Data processing activities
- Personal data categories
- DPIA submission dates
- Blockers or issues
-
Generate formatted status report:
Report Structure
# DPIA Compliance Status Report
**Generated**: [current date]
**Data Source**: [[Page - DPIA Tracker]]
**OneTrust Platform**: [[Weblink - OneTrust DPIA System]]
## Executive Summary
- **Total Projects Tracked**: [count]
- **DPIAs Not Required**: [count]
- **Threshold Assessments Complete**: [count]
- **DPIAs In Progress**: [count]
- **DPIAs Approved**: [count]
- **Projects Requiring Action**: [count]
## Status by Category
### ✅ DPIA Not Required ([count] projects)
| Project | Justification | Reviewed |
| ---------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------- |
| [[Project Name]] | Low risk, no special category data | YYYY-MM-DD |
### ⏳ Threshold Assessment Complete ([count] projects)
| Project | OneTrust ID | Completed | Next Action |
| ----------------- | ----------- | ---------- | --------------------------- |
| [[VendorTooling]] | 6285 | YYYY-MM-DD | Awaiting full DPIA decision |
### 🔄 DPIAs Under Review ([count] projects)
| Project | OneTrust ID | Submitted | Approver | Owner | Days Pending |
| ------------- | ----------- | ---------- | -------- | ------------ | ------------ |
| [[VendorPLM]] | 6284 | YYYY-MM-DD | DPO | [[Jane Doe]] | [X] days |
| [[SPARK]] | 6276 | YYYY-MM-DD | DPO | [[Jane Doe]] | [X] days |
### ✅ DPIAs Approved ([count] projects)
| Project | OneTrust ID | Approved | Valid Until | Notes |
| ---------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------------- |
| [[Project Name]] | XXXX | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | Conditions: [...] |
### ❌ DPIAs Rejected or Requiring Remediation ([count] projects)
| Project | OneTrust ID | Status | Issues | Owner | Action Required |
| ----------- | ----------- | -------- | ----------------------- | --------- | ----------------------- |
| [[Project]] | XXXX | Rejected | Data retention concerns | [[Owner]] | Update retention policy |
## Projects Requiring Immediate Action
### High Priority (DPIAs Overdue or Blocked)
1. **[[Project Name]]**
- Status: Threshold assessment overdue
- Owner: [[Person]]
- Action: Complete assessment in OneTrust
- Due: YYYY-MM-DD
### Medium Priority (DPIAs In Progress >30 days)
1. **[[VendorPLM SaaS Migration]]**
- Status: Under review for [X] days
- Owner: [[Jane Doe]]
- Action: Follow up with DPO
- OneTrust ID: 6284
## DPIA Status by Project
### [[Project - VendorPLM SaaS Migration]]
- **OneTrust ID**: 6284
- **Status**: Under review by YourOrg Data Protection Officer
- **Submitted**: 2025-10-08
- **Owner**: [[Jane Doe]]
- **Risk Level**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Personal Data**: [Types of data processed]
- **Next Steps**: Awaiting DPO approval
- **Timeline**: [Expected approval date]
### [[Project - VendorTooling Tooling - v9 Upgrade]]
- **OneTrust ID**: 6285
- **Status**: Threshold assessment completed
- **Completed**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **Owner**: [[Owner]]
- **Outcome**: [DPIA required/not required]
- **Next Steps**: [Based on outcome]
## Compliance Metrics
### DPIA Timeline Performance
- Average days to complete threshold assessment: [X] days
- Average days for DPIA approval: [X] days
- Projects meeting DPIA deadline: [X]%
### Risk Distribution
- High Risk Projects: [count]
- Medium Risk Projects: [count]
- Low Risk Projects: [count]
## Recommendations
1. **Immediate Actions:**
- [Projects requiring urgent DPIA submission]
- [Follow-ups needed with DPO]
2. **Process Improvements:**
- [Suggestions for streamlining DPIA process]
- [Training needs identified]
3. **Upcoming DPIAs:**
- [Projects in pipeline requiring DPIA]
- [Proactive planning recommendations]
## Follow-up Schedule
| Project | Owner | Next Review | Action |
| ----------- | --------- | ----------- | ------------------ |
| [[Project]] | [[Owner]] | YYYY-MM-DD | Follow up with DPO |
## Related Resources
- [[Page - DPIA Tracker]] - Central DPIA tracking page
- [[Weblink - OneTrust DPIA System]] - OneTrust platform
- [[Project - SecurityEnhancement]] - Security compliance programme
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 217 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2772db8face8
dpia-status is a skill published in the GitHub repository DavidROliverBA/ArchitectKB (52 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,628 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…