Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to davidvornholt/mail-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/main/.agents/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidvornholt/mail-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davidvornholt/mail-mcp/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00592 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · -3 tokens per session 4ca22b900fda
- 10d ago First seen · 46 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A be56d6892998
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository davidvornholt/mail-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 592 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
critic-gate
Full execution protocol for MODE: CRITIC-GATE -- plan critic review, revision loops, and hard stop before execution.
deep-dive
Full execution protocol for MODE: DEEPDIVE — read-only codebase audit with parallel explorer waves, 2 independent reviewers, and sequential critic challenge for HIGH/CRITICAL findings. Loaded on demand by the architect when the deep-dive command emits a [MODE: DEEPDIVE ...] signal.
swarm-pr-feedback
Codex adapter for closing known PR feedback in any repository. Use when asked to address pasted review feedback, GitHub review comments or threads, requested changes, CI/check failures, merge conflicts, stale PR branches, or follow-up work that must verify and close all known PR issues.
code-review
Comprehensive code review methodology with severity classification and confidence thresholds.