Claude Code Templates is a command-line tool and catalogue for configuring Anthropic’s Claude Code with agents, commands, settings, hooks, integrations, skills, and project templates. Developers use it to browse and install reusable components for their coding workflows. The catalogue includes many of these Claude Code components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-opsnpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill llm-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-code-templates/llm-ops.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01938 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00969 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00388 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
llm-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- llm-ops — 92% identical, 27 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 259 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM-OPS -- IA de Producao
Overview
LLM Operations -- RAG, embeddings, vector databases, fine-tuning, prompt engineering avancado, custos de LLM, evals de qualidade e arquiteturas de IA para producao. Ativar para: implementar RAG, criar pipeline de embeddings, Pinecone/Chroma/pgvector, fine-tuning, prompt engineering, reducao de custos de LLM, evals, cache semantico, streaming, agents.
When to Use This Skill
- When you need specialized assistance with this domain
Do Not Use This Skill When
- The task is unrelated to llm ops
- A simpler, more specific tool can handle the request
- The user needs general-purpose assistance without domain expertise
How It Works
A diferenca entre um prototipo de IA e um produto de IA e operabilidade. LLM-Ops e a engenharia que torna IA confiavel, escalavel e economica.
Arquitetura Rag Completa
[Documentos] -> [Chunking] -> [Embeddings] -> [Vector DB] | [Query] -> [Embed query] -> [Semantic Search] -> [Top K chunks] | [LLM + Context] -> [Resposta]
Pipeline De Indexacao
from anthropic import Anthropic import chromadb
client = Anthropic()
chroma = chromadb.PersistentClient(path="./chroma_db")
def chunk_text(text, chunk_size=500, overlap=50):
words = text.split()
chunks = []
for i in range(0, len(words), chunk_size - overlap):
chunk = " ".join(words[i:i + chunk_size])
if chunk: chunks.append(chunk)
return chunks
def index_document(doc_id, content_text, metadata=None):
chunks = chunk_text(content_text)
ids = [f"{doc_id}_chunk_{i}" for i in range(len(chunks))]
collection.upsert(ids=ids, documents=chunks)
return len(chunks)
Pipeline De Query Com Rag
def rag_query(query, top_k=5, system=None): results = collection.query( query_texts=[query], n_results=top_k, include=["documents", "metadatas", "distances"]) context_parts = [] for doc, meta, dist in zip(results["documents"][0], results["metadatas"][0], results["distances"][0]): if dist < 1.5: src = meta.get("source", "doc") context_parts.append(f"[Fonte: {src}] {doc}") context = "
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 259 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A c3b79449c925
llm-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-code-templates (30,533 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,938 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fine-tune-readiness
Decide whether fine-tuning is justified versus prompting or RAG, and gate the training dataset before any LoRA/SFT/DPO run. Use when someone says 'let's fine-tune'.
vector-databases
Vector database operations — embed, store, search, and build RAG pipelines.
ai-native-development
Build AI-first applications with RAG pipelines, embeddings, vector databases, agentic workflows, and LLM integration. Master prompt engineering, function calling, streaming responses, and cost optimization for 2025+ AI development.
dspy
DSPy: declarative LM programs, auto-optimize prompts, RAG.
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
nemotron-retrieval-recipes
Use when planning, debugging, tuning, evaluating, exporting, or deploying public Nemotron embed/rerank retrieval recipes.