complexity-check

complexity-check is a skill for Claude Code from davila7/claude-with-skills. It costs 52 tokens per session (825 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code review procedure that looks for maintainability problems such as oversized files, very long functions, deeply nested conditions, and unexplained numeric values.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during code-quality reviews, before a release, or when assessing whether a codebase is becoming too complex.
Why use it?
It highlights code that may be difficult to understand, test, or change later.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: agent in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it during code-quality reviews, before a release, or when assessing whether a codebase is becoming too complex.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check
About the project

Claude With Skills is a progressive course that teaches developers to create reusable, portable Agent Skills for Claude Code, from basic SKILL.md files to advanced automation and plugin packaging. It is intended for developers who want repeatable instructions and workflows instead of repeatedly pasting the same guidance. The catalogue contains the course's skills, agents, and instruction.

davila7/claude-with-skills · 13 stars · on GitHub · claude-with-skills.vercel.app

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add davila7/claude-with-skills --skill complexity-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-with-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for complexity-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for complexity-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 825 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.00825
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00330
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00165
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00082

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 6c86bc495116, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

complexity-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/content/docs/03-advanced/capstone/solution/.claude/skills/complexity-check/SKILL.md · 94 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check the codebase for complexity violations.

Changed files

!git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "all"

Focus on the changed files listed above. If "all", check the entire codebase.

Check 1: Large files

Find source files over 300 lines (exclude node_modules, dist, .git, vendor, coverage, build):

find . \( -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rb" \) \
  -not -path "*/node_modules/*" \
  -not -path "*/dist/*" \
  -not -path "*/.git/*" \
  -not -path "*/vendor/*" \
  -not -path "*/coverage/*" \
  -not -path "*/build/*" \
  | xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20

Flag any file with more than 300 lines.

Check 2: Long functions

Read each changed source file (or sample the largest files if "all"). Scan for function or method definitions and estimate the line count between consecutive definitions. Flag any function that appears to span more than 50 lines.

Look for these definition patterns:

  • Python: def or async def
  • TypeScript/JavaScript: function , async function , => {, ): void {, ): Promise<
  • Go: func
  • Ruby: def

If a definition is followed by the next definition more than 50 lines later, flag the first function.

Check 3: Deep nesting

Search changed files for lines with 4 or more levels of indentation inside conditional or loop structures. Use these grep patterns (adjust for tab vs space indentation):

For 4-space indentation (16+ spaces):

grep -n "^                " <file>

For tab indentation (4+ tabs):

grep -n "^\t\t\t\t" <file>

Flag files where deeply nested lines appear inside if, for, while, or switch blocks.

Check 4: Magic numbers

Search changed files for numeric literals (other than 0, 1, -1, 2, 100, 1000) used directly in conditions or calculations without a named constant. Look for patterns like:

  • if x > 42:
  • * 3600
  • % 7 ==
  • timeout = 30

Read the full file on GitHub · 94 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 6c86bc495116

Subscribe to this mod's changes

complexity-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-with-skills (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 825 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens