Claude With Skills is a progressive course that teaches developers to create reusable, portable Agent Skills for Claude Code, from basic SKILL.md files to advanced automation and plugin packaging. It is intended for developers who want repeatable instructions and workflows instead of repeatedly pasting the same guidance. The catalogue contains the course's skills, agents, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davila7/claude-with-skills --skill complexity-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-with-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/complexity-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00825 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
complexity-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Check the codebase for complexity violations.
Changed files
!git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "all"
Focus on the changed files listed above. If "all", check the entire codebase.
Check 1: Large files
Find source files over 300 lines (exclude node_modules, dist, .git, vendor, coverage, build):
find . \( -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rb" \) \
-not -path "*/node_modules/*" \
-not -path "*/dist/*" \
-not -path "*/.git/*" \
-not -path "*/vendor/*" \
-not -path "*/coverage/*" \
-not -path "*/build/*" \
| xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20
Flag any file with more than 300 lines.
Check 2: Long functions
Read each changed source file (or sample the largest files if "all"). Scan for function or method definitions and estimate the line count between consecutive definitions. Flag any function that appears to span more than 50 lines.
Look for these definition patterns:
- Python:
deforasync def - TypeScript/JavaScript:
function,async function,=> {,): void {,): Promise< - Go:
func - Ruby:
def
If a definition is followed by the next definition more than 50 lines later, flag the first function.
Check 3: Deep nesting
Search changed files for lines with 4 or more levels of indentation inside conditional or loop structures. Use these grep patterns (adjust for tab vs space indentation):
For 4-space indentation (16+ spaces):
grep -n "^ " <file>
For tab indentation (4+ tabs):
grep -n "^\t\t\t\t" <file>
Flag files where deeply nested lines appear inside if, for, while, or switch blocks.
Check 4: Magic numbers
Search changed files for numeric literals (other than 0, 1, -1, 2, 100, 1000) used directly in conditions or calculations without a named constant. Look for patterns like:
if x > 42:* 3600% 7 ==timeout = 30
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 94 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 6c86bc495116
complexity-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-with-skills (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 825 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.