Claude With Skills is a progressive course that teaches developers to create reusable, portable Agent Skills for Claude Code, from basic SKILL.md files to advanced automation and plugin packaging. It is intended for developers who want repeatable instructions and workflows instead of repeatedly pasting the same guidance. The catalogue contains the course's skills, agents, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davila7/claude-with-skills --skill lightweight-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-with-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00625 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00250 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run a comprehensive code quality audit of this codebase.
Audit areas
Investigate each area systematically. Search broadly before drawing conclusions — read files, grep for patterns, and check multiple directories.
Security
Look for common security issues:
- Hardcoded secrets: search for
password=,api_key=,secret=,token=followed by a literal string value in non-test, non-example files - SQL injection vectors: string concatenation or f-strings/template literals that embed variables directly into SQL query strings
- XSS: direct
innerHTMLassignment in JavaScript or TypeScript files without sanitization - Insecure defaults:
DEBUG=True,CORS allow *,verify=Falsein requests calls,NODE_ENVnot set to production in deployment config
Performance
Look for patterns that commonly cause performance problems:
- N+1 query patterns: a database call inside a loop
- Synchronous operations that could be async: blocking I/O in a path that handles concurrent requests
- Large files read entirely into memory:
fs.readFileSync,open().read()on files that are not guaranteed to be small
Maintainability
- Functions over 50 lines: read source files and estimate function lengths
- Files over 300 lines: use
find . -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | xargs wc -l | sort -rn | head -20(exclude node_modules, dist, .git) - Deeply nested conditionals: more than 4 levels of if/for/while nesting
- Magic numbers: numeric literals used directly in conditions without a named constant
Dependencies
Read package.json, requirements.txt, or go.mod. Note:
- Packages listed as deprecated in their README or comments in the file
- Packages with obvious CVE mentions in README or lock file comments
- Packages pinned to very old major versions (e.g., a major version more than 2 behind current)
Output format
Return a structured report with these sections:
Executive summary — three bullet points covering the most important findings across all areas.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b976df2d72d8
code-quality-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-with-skills (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 625 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…