Claude With Skills is a progressive course that teaches developers to create reusable, portable Agent Skills for Claude Code, from basic SKILL.md files to advanced automation and plugin packaging. It is intended for developers who want repeatable instructions and workflows instead of repeatedly pasting the same guidance. The catalogue contains the course's skills, agents, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add davila7/claude-with-skills --skill lightweight-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-with-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/davila7/claude-with-skills/lightweight-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00625 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run a comprehensive code quality audit of this codebase.
Audit areas
Investigate each area systematically. Search broadly before drawing conclusions — read files, grep for patterns, and check multiple directories.
Security
Look for common security issues:
- Hardcoded secrets: search for
password=,api_key=,secret=,token=followed by a literal string value in non-test, non-example files - SQL injection vectors: string concatenation or f-strings/template literals that embed variables directly into SQL query strings
- XSS: direct
innerHTMLassignment in JavaScript or TypeScript files without sanitization - Insecure defaults:
DEBUG=True,CORS allow *,verify=Falsein requests calls,NODE_ENVnot set to production in deployment config
Performance
Look for patterns that commonly cause performance problems:
- N+1 query patterns: a database call inside a loop
- Synchronous operations that could be async: blocking I/O in a path that handles concurrent requests
- Large files read entirely into memory:
fs.readFileSync,open().read()on files that are not guaranteed to be small
Maintainability
- Functions over 50 lines: read source files and estimate function lengths
- Files over 300 lines: use
find . -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | xargs wc -l | sort -rn | head -20(exclude node_modules, dist, .git) - Deeply nested conditionals: more than 4 levels of if/for/while nesting
- Magic numbers: numeric literals used directly in conditions without a named constant
Dependencies
Read package.json, requirements.txt, or go.mod. Note:
- Packages listed as deprecated in their README or comments in the file
- Packages with obvious CVE mentions in README or lock file comments
- Packages pinned to very old major versions (e.g., a major version more than 2 behind current)
Output format
Return a structured report with these sections:
Executive summary — three bullet points covering the most important findings across all areas.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 62 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b976df2d72d8
code-quality-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-with-skills (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 625 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…