Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00410 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TDD
Follow the governing instructions and the user's requirements for communication, code style, authorization, and delegation. This skill supplies task-specific guidance, not permission to expand the task. Its workflow and output fields describe internal checks and relevant content, not a mandatory response layout or a progress report. When used within broader authorized work, continue that work through completion rather than stopping to deliver this skill's intermediate result.
Use a test to define behavior before implementation when that test provides a fast and trustworthy feedback loop.
Red
Choose the narrowest test seam that observes public behavior rather than internal steps. Write one test for the missing or broken behavior. Run it and confirm that it fails for the expected reason. A syntax error, unrelated failure, or test that already passes does not establish red.
Green
Make the smallest production change that satisfies the test without weakening assertions or bypassing the real path. Run the focused test until it passes, then run nearby tests that protect the same contract.
Refactor
Improve names and structure only while tests remain green. Avoid speculative generalization. Add another test only for a distinct behavior or failure mode.
When red is impractical
Explain why the test cannot be made cheap or reliable. Use a reproduction script, integration check, or manual observable check instead. Do not create a brittle test merely to satisfy the workflow.
Time pressure alone is not a reason to skip the red, green, and refactor evidence or the relevant regression checks. When an alternate check is necessary, record the behavior it does not prove and the resulting residual risk.
Output
Report the failing observation, implementation change, passing evidence, and any broader checks.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +2 lines 749cc5824d08
- 5d ago Changed · +2 lines c770104e9ce7
- 11d ago First seen · 29 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 20f2bfeb5376
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository dayfinggg/openai-codex-agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 410 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug
Debug a stubborn bug with a deterministic reproduction, hypothesis ledger, one-variable fixes, and a regression test. Use after the first obvious look fails, reproduction is unclear, or a fix attempt failed. Not for routine obvious failures; use for "ไล่บั๊ก".
tdd
Test-Driven Development with built-in completion gate — write failing test, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, verify with evidence before claiming success.
tdd
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
imlazy-eval
Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles.
verification-loop
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.
react-web
React web development with hooks, React Query, Zustand.