Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dayvisonassis/sdd-skills --skill coupling-mapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dayvisonassis/sdd-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dayvisonassis/sdd-skills/coupling-map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dayvisonassis/sdd-skills/coupling-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dayvisonassis/sdd-skills/coupling-map.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.02324 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01162 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00465 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
coupling-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 210 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coupling Map
Answers one operational question: which files should be refactored first to reduce systemic risk. A file qualifies when both conditions hold — it does too much, and enough of the system depends on it that breaking it breaks several other parts.
The output is a standalone HTML report. It is diagnostic, not a gate: it fails no build and blocks no commit.
References, loaded on demand, all of which travel with this skill:
references/config-schema.md(every field ofarch.config.json),references/report-contract.md(the shape ofarchitecture.json),references/calibrating-cuts.md(deriving thresholds for a new codebase),references/rejected-metrics.md(read before proposing any metric or axis).The full design argument lives in
docs/Skill_Coupling_Map.mdof the sdd-skills repository, which is not part of an installed copy. Everything needed to run is in the folder you are reading.
The point of the split is cost. The model inspects the tree exactly once, to write a config of about thirty lines. From then on it reads a single JSON file. On the codebase this was built against that is one file instead of 959, and the numbers are identical either way because the script computed them, not the model.
INPUT
Nothing required. Optionally a path to scope the run, --config / --out to override
locations, and --open to launch the finished report in the default browser.
OUTPUT
architecture-report/index.html— the report, opened straight from disk. The script prints it as an absolutefile://URL, which most terminals turn into a link and which pastes into a browser as-is. Hand that link to the reader; a relative path leaves them working out where the file went.architecture-report/architecture.json— the data, and the only file this skill reads on later runs- A short spoken summary: the queue, what moved since the previous run, and what needs a human
PHASE 1 — Preflight
Three checks, in this order. All three passing means skip straight to Phase 3.
What ships with it
20 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/calibrating-cuts.md 4.9 KB
- references/config-schema.md 15 KB
- references/rejected-metrics.md 6.1 KB
- references/report-contract.md 8.1 KB
- scripts/arch-report.mjs 5.0 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/collect.mjs 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/declared.mjs 740 B runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/detect.mjs 2.5 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/graph.mjs 2.8 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/metrics.mjs 1.6 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/output.mjs 524 B runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/render.mjs 36 KB runs code
- scripts/coupling-map/taxonomy.mjs 1.4 KB runs code
- scripts/test/declared.test.mjs 5.8 KB runs code
- scripts/test/detect.test.mjs 10 KB runs code
- scripts/test/graph.test.mjs 3.3 KB runs code
- scripts/test/metrics.test.mjs 5.7 KB runs code
- scripts/test/output.test.mjs 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/test/render.test.mjs 49 KB runs code
- scripts/test/taxonomy.test.mjs 3.9 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 210 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 52c346979e2b
coupling-map is a skill published in the GitHub repository dayvisonassis/sdd-skills (1 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 2,324 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
polish-code
Stage, format, lint, test, review, smoke test, and re-run itself until stable. Use when the user asks to "polish code", "refine code", "iterate on code quality", "review loop", "clean up, test, and review loop", or "run the polish loop".
simplify-code
Run a multi-agent review of changed files for scope, reuse, quality, efficiency, clarity, and altitude issues followed by fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes"…
java-code-review
Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.
reasoning-semiformally
Apply semi-formal certificate reasoning to code analysis — patch verification, fault localization, patch equivalence. Use when reviewing patches, hunting bugs across scopes, comparing fixes, or when code reasoning requires tracing execution across files/modules. Triggers on code review, bug localization, patch…
code-remediate
Apply selected review fixes; bare PR targets use current online items, while PR +review adds the latest matching artifact.