Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude --skill dogfoodgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/dogfood)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/dogfood"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/dogfood/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/dogfood"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/dogfood.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01952 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
dogfood scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · -9 lines f5314943d432
- 26d ago Changed · -1 lines · -1 tokens per session ccbd244fd318
- 29d ago Changed 914a4bdd3ce6
- 1mo ago First seen · 159 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 8719b5164685
dogfood is a skill published in the GitHub repository dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude (6 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,952 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
hermit-scribe
File a GitHub issue or post a comment on an existing issue via a GitHub App bot identity. Use when the operator says "file as a GH issue", "open an issue for PROP-NNN", "report this to the tracker", "add a comment to issue.
implement
Implement a ticket or feature with proportional planning, test first behavior changes, independent review when available, and verification through the real affected surface.
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
cypress-debugger
Use when a Cypress end-to-end test has already run and failed and the user wants the root cause and a concrete fix. Trigger on a failing Cypress spec, Timed-out-retrying command, unresolved selector, cy.intercept alias or request race, suite-breaking hook, retry-only flake, hydration or timing race, or a…
playwright-debugger
Use when a Playwright end-to-end test has already run and failed and the user wants the root cause and a concrete fix. Trigger on a failing Playwright spec, TimeoutError, broken or ambiguous selector, post-deploy suite failure, retry-only flake, hydration or timing race, or a passes-locally-but-fails-in-CI split.…
test-runner
Use this skill when orchestrating agentic end-to-end tests. Resolves target + profile, dispatches the right driver(s) (playwright for web today, peekaboo for macOS (issue #381)), invokes the ux-evaluator agent (opus, read-only) against driver artifacts, reconciles findings with the open issue tracker via…