Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dcassil/resume-kit --skill update-refinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dcassil/resume-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/update-refine)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/update-refine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/update-refine/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/update-refine"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/update-refine.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.01124 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00450 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
update-refine scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
update-refine — structure/base → refine (best-practices wording pass)
Formerly update-best-practices (the standard pass); renamed in RIT-I-0020.
Baselining step 3 of original → base → structure → refine (RIT-I-0016).
Turns the best-practices findings from check-best-practices into the
refine version: auto_suggestible rewrites are applied deterministically, and
needs_user_input items are resolved by asking the user for the real fact —
never by inventing one. Drives the build-refine capability, which writes
<name>-refine.json behind the claim-preservation gate and sets the
refine pointer that all downstream tailoring then prefers.
Prerequisites
Run the shared Prerequisites gate — ../_shared/prerequisites.md.
- Required inputs: a
structureResumeDocumentJSON (run update-shape first; falls back tobaseonly with a recorded shape-pass override), and the best-practices report from check-best-practices. - Does NOT need a job. The refine pass is job-independent.
- If no
structureexists: run update-shape first, or record the explicit override before usingbase.
The walkthrough
- Score. Run check-best-practices on
structure(or the overriddenbase) to get the findings, split intoauto_suggestibleandneeds_user_input. - Elicit facts for needs_user_input items. For each such finding, show its
elicitation_promptand ask the user for the real fact (e.g. an actual metric). Collect answers into an answers map keyed by the finding key (resume_kit_scoring.finding_key). If the user cannot supply a fact, leave that finding unanswered — it will be reported asdeferred, never fabricated. - Build
refine. Callbuild-refinewith the answers map. It applies theauto_suggestiblerewrites plus the user-supplied answers, enforces the claim-preservation gate (the wording pass may reword but must not add, drop, or alter an employer/title/degree/skill claim), writesresume-kit/resumes/<name>-refine.json, and records therefinepointer. - Report. Show
applied(edits made) anddeferred(needs_user_input findings left unanswered). Optionally record a user's declined suggestion via learn-change so future runs weight it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 09c5b0183572
update-refine is a skill published in the GitHub repository dcassil/resume-kit (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,124 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…