Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dcassil/resume-kit/validate-factsnpx skills add dcassil/resume-kit --skill validate-factsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dcassil/resume-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/validate-facts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/validate-facts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dcassil/resume-kit/validate-facts.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00756 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00378 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
validate-facts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Renamed:
validate-factswasvalidate-resume-truthbefore v1.0.0 (see RIT-A-0005).
Inputs must be canonical JSON. This capability consumes a resume as a
ResumeDocumentJSON (build it from a PDF/DOCX/MD/text file with the parse-resume skill) and, where a job is involved, aJobDescriptionJSON (build it with parse-job so skills-coverage scoring works). Run those conversions in subagents, then pass the saved JSON paths here — they live underresume-kit/resumes/andresume-kit/jobs/.
Prerequisites
Run the shared Prerequisites gate first — see
_shared/prerequisites.md.
- Required inputs: a
ResumeDocumentJSON (config.jsonactive_resumeor an explicit path) and a list ofCandidateEvidencerecords. - If missing: STOP and name the upstream skill — no resume JSON → run parse-resume; no evidence → run extract-evidence.
Purpose
Cross-reference a ResumeDocument against a list of CandidateEvidence
records and produce a TruthReport that identifies which resume claims are
supported, unsupported, or contradicted by evidence.
When to use
- Before running
update-keywordsorupdate-terminologyto ensure only truthful content is present. - After alignment to verify the aligned resume does not contain fabricated claims.
- When the user wants an evidence-backed audit of a resume.
Inputs
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
resume |
ResumeDocument |
The resume to validate |
evidence |
list[CandidateEvidence] |
Evidence records (may be empty; empty list produces a report with all claims unsupported) |
Options (CapabilityOptions)
| Option | Default | Effect |
|---|---|---|
strict |
false | Escalate advisory warnings to failures |
no_llm has no effect — this capability is always deterministic.
How to invoke
CLI
resume-tool validate-truth --resume <resume.json> \
[--evidence <evidence.json>] \
[--output {json,text,md}] [--strict]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 84 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 26e58ecf2bce
validate-facts is a skill published in the GitHub repository dcassil/resume-kit (0 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 756 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…