Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dcosodev/market-inspector. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dcosodev/market-inspector/main/.agents/skills/code-conventions/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dcosodev/market-inspectorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcosodev/market-inspector/code-conventions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcosodev/market-inspector/code-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dcosodev/market-inspector/code-conventions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dcosodev/market-inspector/code-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dcosodev/market-inspector/code-conventions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00422 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
code-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Conventions
Use this skill to keep implementation work consistent and reviewable.
TypeScript and structure
- Preserve strict typing. Prefer concrete types, schema-derived types, or
unknownoverany. - Keep server-only credentials and provider clients out of Client Components.
- Validate external input at route, tool, and provider boundaries.
- Reuse shared types and constants instead of duplicating contracts.
- Keep modules focused: source clients fetch data, MCP tools expose read-only operations, agents coordinate behavior, UI renders state.
- Keep comments current and useful. Remove stale phase notes, private conversational comments, and “to myself” language.
Next.js
Before changing framework behavior, read the relevant installed guide under node_modules/next/dist/docs/.
For routes:
- return explicit serializable responses;
- set cache behavior intentionally;
- keep health checks and pings cheap;
- never expose environment values, API keys, provider payloads, prompts, or authorization headers.
Observability
Use lib/observability/logger.ts for structured logs. Log operation names, source names, durations, and safe error summaries.
Never log:
- prompts or model outputs in full;
- raw provider payloads;
- API keys, tokens, cookies, or authorization headers;
- user text as trusted instructions.
Tests
Prefer deterministic tests that mock providers and Gemini. Do not add live market-provider calls or live Gemini calls to CI.
When behavior changes, update the smallest relevant test first or in the same change. Keep acceptance language aligned with the implemented behavior.
Documentation
Update specs, design docs, README files, and code reference material when their contracts changed. Do not leave old feature names, removed portfolio language, or outdated model names in docs or UI copy.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A fbe028dfb1da
code-conventions is a skill published in the GitHub repository dcosodev/market-inspector (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…