Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dean0x/devflow/compliancenpx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.01314 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00657 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Patterns
Regulatory compliance review for code that touches regulated data ${DEVFLOW_COMPLIANCE_SCOPE}. Use alongside devflow:security for complete coverage.
Iron Law
IF IT TOUCHES REGULATED DATA: CLASSIFY IT, MINIMIZE IT, ENCRYPT IT, AUDIT IT
Regulated data crossing a code path without classification, minimization, encryption, or an audit trail is a compliance gap — regardless of framework. No exceptions.
Active Frameworks
${DEVFLOW_COMPLIANCE_ACTIVE}
Scope Boundary
Compliance covers regulatory-specific gaps: retention, erasure/data-subject rights, audit-trail completeness (actor/purpose fields), segregation of duties, framework mapping, IaC exposure. Do NOT re-raise security lens findings (injection, secret handling, authN/Z) — reference those via framework mapping only.
Clean-Report Contract
If the diff/design has no regulated-data surface (no PII/PHI/payment fields, no sensitive data in logs, no IaC, no auth/audit/retention changes) → emit zero findings with a one-line "no compliance-relevant surface detected" note. Never manufacture findings.
Control Categories
1. Data Classification & Minimization
// VULNERABLE: full SSN stored when only last-4 needed
user.ssn = req.body.ssn;
// COMPLIANT: store minimum; annotate purpose + retention
user.ssnLast4 = req.body.ssn.slice(-4); // retention: 90d for verification
2. Sensitive Data in Logs & Errors
// VULNERABLE: PII in structured log
logger.info('login', { email, password, creditCard });
// COMPLIANT: omit or mask regulated fields
logger.info('login', { userId, ip });
3. Encryption In Transit & At Rest
// VULNERABLE: plaintext PHI written to disk
fs.writeFileSync('/data/patients.json', JSON.stringify(records));
// COMPLIANT: encrypt before write; TLS enforced at transport
await vault.encrypt(records, { key: 'phi-key', algo: 'AES-256-GCM' });
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- frameworks/gdpr/fragment.md 388 B
- frameworks/gdpr/reference.md 2.2 KB
- frameworks/hipaa/fragment.md 421 B
- frameworks/hipaa/reference.md 2.5 KB
- frameworks/iso-27001/fragment.md 286 B
- frameworks/iso-27001/reference.md 2.4 KB
- frameworks/pci-dss/fragment.md 406 B
- frameworks/pci-dss/reference.md 2.4 KB
- frameworks/soc2/fragment.md 275 B
- frameworks/soc2/reference.md 2.1 KB
- frameworks/sox/fragment.md 270 B
- frameworks/sox/reference.md 3.1 KB
- references/detection.md 3.0 KB
- references/sources.md 2.0 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 122 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A a43989b8cc64
compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (19 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,314 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-engineering
Skill "data-engineering" from fengshao1227/ccg-workflow, covering 数据工程域 · data engineering, 域概览, 数据管道编排, 框架对比 and airflow 核心模式.
verify-change
变更校验关卡。分析代码变更,检测文档同步状态,评估变更影响范围。当用户提到变更检查、文档同步、代码审查、提交前检查、diff分析时使用。在设计级变更、重构完成时自动触发。.
verify-security
安全校验关卡。自动扫描代码安全漏洞,检测危险模式,确保安全决策有文档记录。当用户提到安全扫描、漏洞检测、安全审计、代码安全、OWASP、注入检测、敏感信息泄露时使用。在新建模块、安全相关变更、攻防任务、重构完成时自动触发。.
liquid-glass
Apple Liquid Glass design system. Use when building UI with translucent, depth-aware glass morphism following Apple's design language. Provides CSS tokens, component patterns, dark/light mode, and animation specs.
gen-docs
文档生成器。自动分析模块结构,生成 README.md 和 DESIGN.md 骨架。当用户提到生成文档、创建README、创建DESIGN、文档骨架、文档模板时使用。在新建模块开始时自动触发。.
verify-module
模块完整性校验关卡。扫描目录结构、检测缺失文档、验证代码与文档同步。当用户提到模块校验、文档检查、结构完整性、README检查、DESIGN检查时使用。在新建模块完成时自动触发。.