Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill gogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/go)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01136 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00454 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00227 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00114 |
Grade A, and why
go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Patterns
Reference for Go-specific patterns, idioms, and best practices. Full bibliography: references/sources.md.
Iron Law
ERRORS ARE VALUES [5][7]
Never ignore errors.
if err != nilis correctness, not boilerplate. Every error return must be checked, wrapped with context, or explicitly documented as intentionally ignored with_ = fn(). "Errors are values. Values can be programmed." — Rob Pike [5]
When This Skill Activates
Working with Go codebases — error handling, interfaces, goroutines, channels, packages.
Error Handling [5][6]
// BAD: return err — caller loses context
// GOOD: return fmt.Errorf("reading config %s: %w", path, err)
var ErrNotFound = errors.New("not found")
func FindUser(id string) (*User, error) {
u, err := db.Get(id)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("finding user %s: %w", id, err)
}
if u == nil { return nil, ErrNotFound }
return u, nil
}
// Caller: if errors.Is(err, ErrNotFound) { ... }
Interface Design [7][14]
// "The bigger the interface, the weaker the abstraction" — Rob Pike [7]
// BAD: func NewService(repo *PostgresRepo) *Service
// GOOD: func NewService(repo Repository) *Service — accept interfaces [14]
// Small interfaces compose cleanly [1]
type Reader interface { Read(p []byte) (n int, err error) }
type Writer interface { Write(p []byte) (n int, err error) }
type ReadWriter interface { Reader; Writer }
Concurrency [9][10][13]
CSP (Hoare [9]): "Do not communicate by sharing memory; share memory by communicating." [10]
// Context cancellation with errgroup [16][22]
func Process(ctx context.Context, items []Item) error {
g, ctx := errgroup.WithContext(ctx)
for _, item := range items {
g.Go(func() error { return processItem(ctx, item) })
}
return g.Wait()
}
// Channel direction prevents misuse at compile time [1][8]
func producer(ch chan<- int) { ch <- 42 }
func consumer(ch <-chan int) { v := <-ch; _ = v }
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -21 tokens per session c06d789f1558
- 1mo ago First seen · 148 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A e196268c9472
go is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,136 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
plugin-dev
Validate plugin SKILL.md frontmatter and audit hook scripts for silent failures. Run validation to check all plugins pass schema, source path, and frontmatter checks. Run hook audit to detect unhandled errors in shell and Python scripts.
sample-plugin
Sample plugin demonstrating the Skills + Tools model. Includes a Python tool (greeting) and a TypeScript tool (calculator).
code-review-php
Deep PHP-specific code review covering strict types, PHPStan compliance, PSR standards, domain modeling, and ORM boundary violations. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when PHP code is detected. Invoked when reviewing PHP PRs, Symfony/Laravel changes, or performing PHP-specific quality checks.
code-review-python
Deep Python-specific code review covering type annotations, async pitfalls, mutable defaults, threading safety, and domain modeling. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Python code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Python PRs, Py changes, or performing Python-specific quality checks.