Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dean0x/devflow --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dean0x/devflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/test-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dean0x/devflow/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dean0x/devflow/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02043 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00817 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Enforce the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for all implementation work. Tests define the design. Code satisfies the tests. Refactoring improves the design without changing behavior.
Iron Law
TESTS FIRST, ALWAYS
Write the failing test before the production code. No exceptions. If you catch yourself writing production code without a failing test, stop immediately, delete the production code, write the test, watch it fail, then write the minimum code to make it pass. The test IS the specification.
The Cycle
Affected tests: the tests that cover the changed files, selected by the runner's related-test option (Jest's --findRelatedTests, Vitest's related) or, where the runner has none, the package or path that owns them. Every "run the tests" step below means the affected tests; the full suite belongs to Validate.
Step 1: RED — Write a Failing Test
Write a test that describes the behavior you want. Run it. Watch it fail. The failure message IS your specification.
Describe what the code SHOULD do, not how it does it.
One behavior per test. One assertion per test (ideally).
Name tests as sentences: "returns error when email is invalid"
Checkpoint: The test MUST fail before proceeding. A test that passes immediately proves nothing.
Step 2: GREEN — Write Minimum Code to Pass
Write the simplest production code that makes the failing test pass. No more, no less.
Hardcode first if that's simplest. Generalize when the next test forces it.
Don't write code "you'll need later." Write code the test demands NOW.
Don't optimize. Don't refactor. Don't clean up. Just pass the test.
Checkpoint: All affected tests pass. If any test fails, fix it before moving on.
Step 3: REFACTOR — Improve Without Changing Behavior
Now clean up: extract helpers, rename, simplify, apply DRY. Tests stay green throughout.
Run the affected tests after every refactoring step.
If a test breaks during refactor, undo immediately — you changed behavior.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -20 lines · -6 tokens per session ff4fa54b3bbb
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines e3aa48a115bf
- 1mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d841ab907be7
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository dean0x/devflow (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,043 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Review Cool Workflow pull requests or branch diffs. Use when Codex must inspect code changes for bugs, regressions, FreeBSD/POLA violations, missing tests, generated artifact drift, release-contract risk, or CI implications, and return findings first with file/line citations.
program-repair
Localise, write several patches, and keep the one that holds. Use when the task involves: automated program repair, fault localization, majority vote patch, repair, localize, patch generation.
bug-hunt
Reproduce, shrink, instrument, fix — then lock it with a test. Use when the task involves: bug, debug, diagnose, crash, incident, repro.
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…