Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add decebals/claude-code-java --skill java-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-javaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/decebals/claude-code-java/java-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/decebals/claude-code-java/java-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/decebals/claude-code-java/java-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/decebals/claude-code-java/java-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/decebals/claude-code-java/java-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.02369 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00948 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00474 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
java-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 410 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Java Code Review Skill
Systematic code review checklist for Java projects.
When to Use
- User says "review this code" / "check this PR" / "code review"
- Before merging a PR
- After implementing a feature
Review Strategy
- Quick scan - Understand intent, identify scope
- Checklist pass - Go through each category below
- Summary - List findings by severity (Critical → Minor)
Output Format
## Code Review: [file/feature name]
### Critical
- [Issue description + line reference + suggestion]
### Improvements
- [Suggestion + rationale]
### Minor/Style
- [Nitpicks, optional improvements]
### Good Practices Observed
- [Positive feedback - important for morale]
Review Checklist
1. Null Safety
Check for:
// ❌ NPE risk
String name = user.getName().toUpperCase();
// ✅ Safe
String name = Optional.ofNullable(user.getName())
.map(String::toUpperCase)
.orElse("");
// ✅ Also safe (early return)
if (user.getName() == null) {
return "";
}
return user.getName().toUpperCase();
Flags:
- Chained method calls without null checks
- Missing
@Nullable/@NonNullannotations on public APIs Optional.get()withoutisPresent()check- Returning
nullfrom methods that could returnOptionalor empty collection
Suggest:
- Use
Optionalfor return types that may be absent - Use
Objects.requireNonNull()for constructor/method params - Return empty collections instead of null:
Collections.emptyList()
2. Exception Handling
Check for:
// ❌ Swallowing exceptions
try {
process();
} catch (Exception e) {
// silently ignored
}
// ❌ Catching too broad
catch (Exception e) { }
catch (Throwable t) { }
// ❌ Losing stack trace
catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());
}
// ✅ Proper handling
catch (IOException e) {
log.error("Failed to process file: {}", filename, e);
throw new ProcessingException("File processing failed", e);
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 410 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 97a6ac61f19d
java-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository decebals/claude-code-java (754 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,369 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
814-regulations-iso-25010
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an…
121-java-object-oriented-design
Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception…
053-design-simple-rules
Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's…
phx-review
Review changed Elixir/Phoenix code read-only. Check requirements, cite evidence, deduplicate findings, and return a severity-based verdict.
112-java-maven-plugins
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) …
059-design-atdd
Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect…