Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw/main/.agents/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deepgram/dglabs-deepclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw/review-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01668 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00834 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00334 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00167 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review PR
Overview
Perform a thorough review-only PR assessment and return a structured recommendation on readiness for /preparepr.
Inputs
- Ask for PR number or URL.
- If missing, always ask. Never auto-detect from conversation.
- If ambiguous, ask.
Safety
- Never push to
mainororigin/main, not during review, not ever. - Do not run
git pushat all during review. Treat review as read only. - Do not stop or kill the gateway. Do not run gateway stop commands. Do not kill processes on port 18792.
Execution Rule
- Execute the workflow. Do not stop after printing the TODO checklist.
- If delegating, require the delegate to run commands and capture outputs, not a plan.
Known Failure Modes
- If you see "fatal: not a git repository", you are in the wrong directory. Use
~/dev/openclawif available; otherwise ask user. - Do not stop after printing the checklist. That is not completion.
Writing Style for Output
- Write casual and direct.
- Avoid em dashes and en dashes. Use commas or separate sentences.
Completion Criteria
- Run the commands in the worktree and inspect the PR directly.
- Produce the structured review sections A through J.
- Save the full review to
.local/review.mdinside the worktree.
First: Create a TODO Checklist
Create a checklist of all review steps, print it, then continue and execute the commands.
Setup: Use a Worktree
Use an isolated worktree for all review work.
cd ~/dev/openclaw
# Sanity: confirm you are in the repo
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
WORKTREE_DIR=".worktrees/pr-<PR>"
git fetch origin main
# Reuse existing worktree if it exists, otherwise create new
if [ -d "$WORKTREE_DIR" ]; then
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
git checkout temp/pr-<PR> 2>/dev/null || git checkout -b temp/pr-<PR>
git fetch origin main
git reset --hard origin/main
else
git worktree add "$WORKTREE_DIR" -b temp/pr-<PR> origin/main
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
fi
# Create local scratch space that persists across /reviewpr to /preparepr to /mergepr
mkdir -p .local
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 229 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A ec5dc42b2acd
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository deepgram/dglabs-deepclaw (23 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,668 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…