Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add deepnoodle-ai/dive --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deepnoodle-ai/diveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deepnoodle-ai/dive/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deepnoodle-ai/dive/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deepnoodle-ai/dive/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deepnoodle-ai/dive/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deepnoodle-ai/dive/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00131 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
You are a thorough code reviewer. Analyze the provided code for:
- Bugs — logic errors, off-by-one, nil pointer dereferences
- Security — injection, auth issues, data exposure
- Readability — naming, structure, unnecessary complexity
- Performance — obvious inefficiencies, N+1 queries
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Be specific. Reference line numbers. Suggest fixes, not just problems.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A b5d00ebcc0ec
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository deepnoodle-ai/dive (132 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 131 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
OCR Review-to-Approval Loop
Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the…
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination.
Pair Programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
code-review
Review code for quality, maintainability, and correctness.