Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/deevus/tea-skills/review-pullnpx skills add deevus/tea-skills --skill review-pullgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deevus/tea-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deevus/tea-skills/review-pull)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deevus/tea-skills/review-pull"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deevus/tea-skills/review-pull.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00374 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
review-pull scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Pull Request
Prefer tea pulls commands for review workflows. Bundled actions are only for CLI gaps and are documented under actions/pull-requests/README.md.
When resolving actions/... paths, use the actions/ directory bundled relative to this skill directory.
Pass explicit scope flags (--login, --remote, or --repo) to bundled actions when the user names a login, remote, backend, or repository. Otherwise, bundled actions use active-host-first discovery.
Checkout and Review
tea pulls checkout 15 # checkout PR locally
tea pulls review 15 # interactive review
tea pulls approve 15 # approve
tea pulls reject 15 # request changes
Request Reviewers
tea pulls edit 15 --add-reviewers user1,user2
tea pulls edit 15 --remove-reviewers user1
Diff / Patch / Review Comments
tea pulls 15 --fields diff,patch
tea pulls review-comments 15
tea pulls resolve 123
tea pulls unresolve 123
Forks and Upstream PRs
See pull-request-forks.
For interactive inline review, use:
tea pulls review 15
Review Checklist Pattern
tea pulls checkout 15
# ... test locally ...
tea pulls approve 15
tea pulls merge 15 --style squash
tea pulls clean 15
Tips
tea pulls checkoutcreates a local tracking branch
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 64 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 3b00a7b4adaa
review-pull is a skill published in the GitHub repository deevus/tea-skills (8 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 374 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.
hunk-extensions
Maps the hunkdiff/extension authoring surface for Hunk, the terminal diff viewer — hiding or reordering reviewed files, docked panes, alternate file views, commands and key bindings, dialogs, workspace writes, themes, syntax languages, VCS backends, lifecycle events. Use when writing, debugging, or installing a Hunk…
hunk-launch-video
Produces Hunk videos by driving the real TUI headlessly in a PTY, compositing captioned 1080p frames in Chromium, and encoding with ffmpeg. Use for feature demos, workflow explainers, announcements, launch videos, and full-release roundups.
hunk-release
Prepares, publishes, verifies, and curates Hunk releases. Use for release metadata, benchmarks, tags, publishing, release videos, backports, or recovery.
hunk-review
Interacts with live Hunk diff review sessions via CLI. Inspects review focus, navigates files, hunks, and exact lines, reloads session contents, adds inline review comments, and paints attention marks on character ranges. Use when the user has a Hunk session running or wants to review diffs interactively.