Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit --skill delphi-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/delphi-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/delphi-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/delphi-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/delphi-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/delphi-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00863 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
Delphi SOLID Patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- delphi-patterns — 91% identical, 7 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 356 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Delphi SOLID Patterns — Skill
Use this skill when the user requests the creation of classes, services, repositories or any structure that follows SOLID principles in Delphi.
When to Use
- When creating a new domain entity
- When creating a repository (data access)
- When creating a service (business logic)
- When implementing a use case
- When applying any design pattern (Factory, Strategy, Observer)
Repository Pattern
Repository Interface
unit MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Repository.Intf;
interface
uses
System.Generics.Collections,
MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Entity;
type
///<summary>
///Interface for client reading operations.
///</summary>
ICustomerReadRepository = interface
['{A1B2C3D4-E5F6-7890-ABCD-EF1234567890}']
function FindById(AId: Integer): TCustomer;
function FindAll: TObjectList<TCustomer>;
function FindByCpf(const ACpf: string): TCustomer;
end;
///<summary>
///Interface for client writing operations.
///</summary>
ICustomerWriteRepository = interface
['{B2C3D4E5-F6A7-8901-BCDE-F12345678901}']
procedure Insert(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Update(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Delete(AId: Integer);
end;
///<summary>
///Complete repository interface combining reading and writing.
///</summary>
ICustomerRepository = interface(ICustomerReadRepository)
['{C3D4E5F6-A7B8-9012-CDEF-123456789012}']
procedure Insert(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Update(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Delete(AId: Integer);
end;
implementation
end.
Implementation with FireDAC
unit MeuApp.Infra.Customer.Repository;
interface
uses
System.SysUtils,
System.Generics.Collections,
FireDAC.Comp.Client,
MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Entity,
MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Repository.Intf;
type
TCustomerRepository = class(TInterfacedObject, ICustomerRepository)
private
FConnection: TFDConnection;
public
constructor Create(AConnection: TFDConnection);
{ ICustomerReadRepository }
function FindById(AId: Integer): TCustomer;
function FindAll: TObjectList<TCustomer>;
function FindByCpf(const ACpf: string): TCustomer;
{ ICustomerWriteRepository }
procedure Insert(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Update(ACustomer: TCustomer);
procedure Delete(AId: Integer);
end;
implementation
constructor TCustomerRepository.Create(AConnection: TFDConnection);
begin
inherited Create;
if not Assigned(AConnection) then
raise EArgumentNilException.Create('AConnection cannot be nil');
FConnection := AConnection;
end;
function TCustomerRepository.FindById(AId: Integer): TCustomer;
var
LQuery: TFDQuery;
begin
Result := nil;
LQuery := TFDQuery.Create(nil);
try
LQuery.Connection := FConnection;
LQuery.SQL.Text := 'SELECT * FROM customers WHERE id = :id';
LQuery.ParamByName('id').AsInteger := AId;
LQuery.Open;
if not LQuery.IsEmpty then
begin
Result := TCustomer.Create(LQuery.FieldByName('name').AsString);
Result.Id := LQuery.FieldByName('id').AsInteger;
end;
finally
LQuery.Free;
end;
end;
//... other methods follow the same pattern
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 356 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A a92d879791f2
Delphi SOLID Patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit (56 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,157 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-advanced-redteam
Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC…
offensive-dependency-confusion
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-wifi
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons…