Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit --skill dunitx-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/dunitx-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/dunitx-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/dunitx-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/dunitx-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/dunitx-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01660 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
DUnitX Testing Patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- dunitx-testing — 92% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 311 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DUnitX Testing Patterns — Skill
Use this skill when creating or organizing unit tests in Delphi projects.
When to Use
- When creating tests for new features
- When applying TDD (Test-Driven Development)
- When creating database integration tests
- When refactoring existing tests
Test Project Structure
tests/
├── MeuApp.Tests.dpr ← Projeto de testes
├── Domain/
│ ├── MeuApp.Tests.Customer.Entity.pas
│ └── MeuApp.Tests.Order.Entity.pas
├── Application/
│ ├── MeuApp.Tests.Customer.Service.pas
│ └── MeuApp.Tests.Order.Service.pas
├── Infrastructure/
│ └── MeuApp.Tests.Customer.Repository.pas
└── Helpers/
├── MeuApp.Tests.Helpers.Database.pas
└── MeuApp.Tests.Helpers.Mocks.pas
Basic Test Fixture
unit MeuApp.Tests.Customer.Service;
interface
uses
DUnitX.TestFramework,
MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Entity,
MeuApp.Domain.Customer.Repository.Intf,
MeuApp.Application.Customer.Service;
type
[TestFixture]
TCustomerServiceTest = class
private
FService: TCustomerService;
FMockRepo: ICustomerRepository;
public
[Setup]
procedure Setup;
[TearDown]
procedure TearDown;
[Test]
procedure CreateCustomer_WithValidData_ShouldSucceed;
[Test]
procedure CreateCustomer_WithEmptyName_ShouldRaiseException;
[Test]
procedure CreateCustomer_WithDuplicateCpf_ShouldRaiseException;
[Test]
procedure GetById_WithExistingId_ShouldReturnCustomer;
[Test]
procedure GetById_WithInvalidId_ShouldRaiseNotFoundException;
end;
implementation
uses
System.SysUtils;
{ TCustomerServiceTest }
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.Setup;
begin
FMockRepo := TMemoryCustomerRepository.Create;
FService := TCustomerService.Create(FMockRepo);
end;
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.TearDown;
begin
FService.Free;
//FMockRepo is interface — released automatically
end;
[Test]
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.CreateCustomer_WithValidData_ShouldSucceed;
begin
Assert.WillNotRaiseAny(
procedure
begin
FService.CreateCustomer('João Silva', '12345678901', '[email protected]');
end
);
end;
[Test]
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.CreateCustomer_WithEmptyName_ShouldRaiseException;
begin
Assert.WillRaise(
procedure
begin
FService.CreateCustomer('', '12345678901', '[email protected]');
end,
EValidationException
);
end;
[Test]
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.CreateCustomer_WithDuplicateCpf_ShouldRaiseException;
begin
FService.CreateCustomer('João', '12345678901', '[email protected]');
Assert.WillRaise(
procedure
begin
FService.CreateCustomer('Maria', '12345678901', '[email protected]');
end,
EBusinessRuleException
);
end;
[Test]
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.GetById_WithExistingId_ShouldReturnCustomer;
var
LCustomer: TCustomer;
begin
FService.CreateCustomer('João', '12345678901', '[email protected]');
LCustomer := FService.GetById(1);
try
Assert.IsNotNull(LCustomer);
Assert.AreEqual('João', LCustomer.Name);
finally
LCustomer.Free;
end;
end;
[Test]
procedure TCustomerServiceTest.GetById_WithInvalidId_ShouldRaiseNotFoundException;
begin
Assert.WillRaise(
procedure
begin
FService.GetById(999);
end,
EEntityNotFoundException
);
end;
initialization
TDUnitX.RegisterTestFixture(TCustomerServiceTest);
end.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 311 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A f21ae6f2bf14
DUnitX Testing Patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit (56 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
csharp-testing-standards
Defines the testing standards, patterns, and conventions for all C# unit and integration test projects. Rules cover test framework usage, naming, structure, mocking, assertions, and parameterization. Apply these rules uniformly across all test projects.
vitest
Provides comprehensive guidance for Vitest testing framework including fast test execution, Vite integration, component testing, mocking, and configuration. Use when the user asks about Vitest, needs to write fast unit tests, test Vue/React components, or configure Vitest with Vite projects.
pytest
Provides comprehensive guidance for pytest testing framework including test writing, fixtures, parametrization, mocking, and plugins. Use when the user asks about pytest, needs to write Python tests, use pytest fixtures, or configure pytest for Python projects.
r-testthat
Best practices for writing R package tests with testthat version 3+. Use this skill when writing or organizing tests for an R package or when improving existing tests that use testthat. It covers test structure and expectations, self-sufficient test design, proper cleanup with withr, fixtures, mocking external…
jest
Jest testing best practices for JavaScript and TypeScript applications, covering test structure, mocking, and assertion patterns.
rspec
RSpec testing best practices for Ruby and Rails applications, covering test organization, data management, and isolation patterns.