Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dengls24/annota. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dengls24/annota/master/.claude/skills/annota-summarize/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dengls24/annotaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengls24/annota/annota-summarize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengls24/annota/annota-summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dengls24/annota/annota-summarize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dengls24/annota/annota-summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dengls24/annota/annota-summarize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00799 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
annota-summarize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
论文结构化笔记
为一篇学术论文生成结构化阅读笔记，并保存到 Zotero。
输入解析
用户输入：$ARGUMENTS
工作流程
Step 1：定位论文
如果用户提供了文件路径，直接使用。否则用 search_zotero_items 搜索。
Step 2：获取元数据
调用 get_item_metadata(item_id) 获取：
- 标题、作者、年份、期刊/会议、DOI
Step 3：提取全文
调用 get_pdf_text_bulk(item_id, skip_refs=True) 提取论文正文。
Step 4：生成结构化笔记
仔细阅读全文，按以下模板生成笔记：
<h2>📄 论文信息</h2>
<p><b>标题：</b>{title}</p>
<p><b>作者：</b>{authors}</p>
<p><b>发表：</b>{venue} {year}</p>
<p><b>DOI：</b>{doi}</p>
<h2>🎯 核心问题</h2>
<p>这篇论文要解决什么问题？为什么重要？</p>
<h2>💡 核心贡献</h2>
<ol>
<li>贡献 1</li>
<li>贡献 2</li>
<li>贡献 3</li>
</ol>
<h2>🔧 方法</h2>
<p>提出了什么方法/架构/算法？关键设计决策是什么？</p>
<h2>📊 实验结果</h2>
<ul>
<li>关键指标和数据</li>
<li>与 baseline 的对比</li>
</ul>
<h2>⚠️ 局限性</h2>
<ul>
<li>论文自述的 limitation</li>
<li>你认为的潜在不足</li>
</ul>
<h2>💭 个人启发</h2>
<p>这篇论文对我的研究有什么启发？可以借鉴什么？</p>
<h2>🔗 相关工作</h2>
<p>值得进一步阅读的参考文献</p>
Step 5：保存到 Zotero
提醒用户：保存笔记需要关闭 Zotero。
调用 add_child_note(parent_item_id, note_content) 将笔记保存为论文的子笔记。
parent_item_id 是文献条目的 ID（不是 PDF 附件的 ID）。可以从 get_item_metadata 返回的 itemID 获取。
Step 6：确认
告诉用户笔记已保存，提醒打开 Zotero 按 Ctrl+Shift+R 刷新查看。
注意事项
- 笔记内容使用 HTML 格式（Zotero 原生支持）
- 每个要点简洁有力，避免复制粘贴原文大段内容
- "个人启发"部分可以根据用户的研究方向定制（如果已知）
- 如果论文是中文的，笔记用中文；英文论文默认中文笔记，关键术语保留英文
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 98 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A fcbd544a2c68
annota-summarize is a skill published in the GitHub repository dengls24/annota (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 799 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
venue-templates
Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing…
doc-audit
Evaluate one project document in detail — a workbook section, big picture, strategy map, handoff message, paper, brief, or primer — without editing it. Runs the mechanical lint, builds a claim ledger, types every headline against the eight claim statuses in CLAUDE.md, traces cited evidence to the scripts and logs that…
latex-compile
Compile a LaTeX document and fix every error plus aesthetic issue (overfull/underfull boxes, widows, alignment, fonts) for a clean PDF and log. Use this instead of running pdflatex/latexmk manually — it avoids the latexmk stale-log trap and silent grep failures on binary log output, and it reformats rather than…
sync-brief
Propagate load-bearing changes from workbook.tex to brief.tex.
claude-project-manifest
Creates annotated bibliography-style manifests for Claude projects, tracking files, conversation threads, and relationships with unique IDs and annotations. Use when documenting project contents, creating file inventories, tracking conversation history, or building navigable knowledge maps.
latex-setup
Use when the user wants to set up or troubleshoot a LaTeX environment, choose between biber and bibtex, install packages for a specific venue template, or configure compilation. Triggers on phrases like "setup latex", "biber vs bibtex", "latex compilation error", "install latex packages", "venue template", or "texlive…