Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DennisLiuCk/claude-plugin-marketplace --skill issue-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DennisLiuCk/claude-plugin-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dennisliuck/claude-plugin-marketplace/issue-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dennisliuck/claude-plugin-marketplace/issue-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dennisliuck/claude-plugin-marketplace/issue-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dennisliuck/claude-plugin-marketplace/issue-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dennisliuck/claude-plugin-marketplace/issue-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02868 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01147 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00574 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
issue-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 356 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 08b1f56eecf0
issue-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository DennisLiuCk/claude-plugin-marketplace (28 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,868 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
technical-debt-audit
Use when the user says 'clean up my wordpress', 'what is bloating my wordpress', 'find orphaned shortcodes', or 'scan for unused plugins'. Audits orphaned shortcodes from deleted plugins, unused plugins, database bloat, unused media, and leftover data from inactive builders.
wordpress-site-dna
Use when the user says 'analyze my wordpress site', 'what is running on my site', 'site dna', or 'what plugins are on my site'. Detects every page builder, audits active versus dead-weight plugins, maps content structure, finds orphaned shortcodes, and checks performance and security posture.
code-review
Perform comprehensive code reviews covering bugs, style, performance, security, and best practices. Use this skill when the user mentions: review my code, check this code, code review, find bugs, improve code, refactor suggestions, security audit, performance optimization, code quality, static analysis.
launchworthy
Production readiness audit that turns a demo into a real product. Built for apps shipped fast with AI coding tools (Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor, Claude Code). Auto-detects your stack and audits 5 domains (Frontend, Backend & Data, Auth & Security, Infrastructure, Operations), then produces a scored scorecard and a…
trailofbits-security
Security-focused static analysis and code auditing skills from Trail of Bits. Includes CodeQL deep analysis, Semgrep scanning, and SARIF result processing. Use when performing security audits, running static analysis, scanning for vulnerabilities, or processing scan results.
astro-troubleshooting
This skill should be used when debugging Astro issues, identifying Astro anti-patterns, fixing common Astro mistakes, troubleshooting Astro errors, resolving "document is not defined" in Astro, resolving "window is not defined" in Astro, diagnosing a component not interactive, fixing content validation errors…