deno: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md

review-pr is a skill for Claude Code from denoland/deno. It costs 39 tokens per session (1,681 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for pull requests in Deno, a JavaScript and TypeScript runtime. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes submitted for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing changes in the denoland/deno repository, checking automated results and pull-request requirements, and deciding whether the changes are ready to approve.
Why use it?
It gives reviews a consistent checklist for build checks, tests, security, project conventions, and required contribution rules.

Skill for Claude Code ✓ vendor

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is denoland/deno's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on deno itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything deno configures →

About the project

Deno is a runtime that executes JavaScript, TypeScript, and WebAssembly programs outside a browser. Developers use it for applications such as web servers, and the catalogue add-ons provide workflows and guidance for Deno projects.

denoland/deno · 108,388 stars · on GitHub · deno.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to denoland/deno. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/denoland/deno/main/.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/denoland/deno

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-pr

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/denoland/deno/review-pr.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/denoland/deno/review-pr)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/denoland/deno/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/denoland/deno/review-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,681 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Snyk warn 6 Sept 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.01681
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00840
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00336
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00168

Measured 8d ago against content hash 0384a931fff8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md · 177 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Deno PR Reviewer

Review PR $ARGUMENTS on the denoland/deno repository.

Step 1: Gather PR context

Fetch the PR metadata, diff, and comments:

gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json number,title,body,author,labels,state,reviewDecision,commits,files,isDraft,createdAt,url
gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --comments --json comments
gh pr checks $ARGUMENTS --json name,state,conclusion 2>/dev/null || echo "No checks found"

Step 2: Gate checks

Before reviewing code, check these gates. If any fail, flag them prominently at the top of your review and do not approve.

  1. CI status — All checks must pass. Point the author to specific failing checks. Known flaky tests (labeled ci-test-flaky) can be re-run.
  2. PR title format — Must follow type(scope): description. Types: feat, fix, perf, refactor, chore, docs, test, revert, BREAKING. Scope examples: ext/node, ext/fetch, cli, lsp, runtime.
  3. No force pushes — PRs are squash-merged. Authors should push new commits, not rewrite history.
  4. Focused scope — No drive-by cleanups or unrelated changes. Those belong in separate PRs.
  5. AI disclosure — If the PR looks AI-generated (boilerplate-heavy, generic comments, suspiciously broad) but has no disclosure, ask about it.
  6. Linked issue (external contributors) — If the PR author is not a denoland org member, the PR must link to an issue. If there is no linked issue, request changes and ask the author to open an issue and discuss the change first.

Step 3: Code review

Read every changed file in the diff. Use the repo tools (Read, Grep, Glob) to understand surrounding context when needed.

Rust code

  • Correctness: Edge cases handled? No .unwrap() on user-controlled data?
  • Error handling: Proper error types, meaningful messages, no swallowed errors.
  • Performance: No unnecessary allocations/copies, no blocking in async code.
  • Safety: No unsafe without strong justification. No command injection, path traversal, or permission bypasses.
  • Permissions: New capabilities must go through Deno's permission system. Watch ext/node/ especially — Node.js APIs sometimes assume full access.
  • Dependencies: New Cargo deps need strong justification. Prefer existing deps or stdlib.

Read the full file on GitHub · 177 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 177 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 0384a931fff8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository denoland/deno (108,388 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,681 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.