Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to deonmenezes/mantishack. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/deonmenezes/mantishack/main/.codex/skills/test-tui/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deonmenezes/mantishackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deonmenezes/mantishack/test-tui)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deonmenezes/mantishack/test-tui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deonmenezes/mantishack/test-tui.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00127 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
test-tui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test-tui — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You can start and use Codex TUI to verify changes.
Important notes:
Start interactively.
Always set RUST_LOG="trace" when starting the process.
Pass -c log_dir=<some_temp_dir> argument to have logs written to a specific directory to help with debugging.
When sending a test message programmatically, send text first, then send Enter in a separate write (do not send text + Enter in one burst).
Use just codex target to run - just codex -c ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 15 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A e81787c2d976
test-tui is a skill published in the GitHub repository deonmenezes/mantishack (494 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 127 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test-tui, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
score-harness
5-dimension scorecard (0-100, grade A/B/C/F) for a scaffolded harness. Dimensions: Repo understanding (25%), Agent usefulness (25%), MCP safety (20%), Test coverage (15%), Publish readiness (15%). Emits a 6-field badges block (score + mcpRisk + 4 booleans) ready for the harness README. Exit 0 A/B, 1 C, 2 F.
validate-harness
Release-readiness umbrella check for a scaffolded harness — runs doctor, witness verify, hardcoded-path scan, MCP server config, and GCP Secret Manager validation in one shot. Exits non-zero if any sub-check fails.
C31-review
Reviews code changes using dynamically selected reviewer personas, then runs a verify-work pass: UAT walkthrough, verifier validation, and decision coverage logging. Writes memory/.planning/phases/XX-VERIFICATION.md.
C31-coding-discipline
A disciplined workflow for coding tasks that requires a failing test before production code, a plan, isolated work for larger changes, review, and final verification. TDD, or test-driven development, means writing the failing test first, then making it pass.
agent-benchmark-suite
Agent skill for benchmark-suite - invoke with $agent-benchmark-suite.
agent-harness-fault-injection
Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.