Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills --skill set-lineupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills/set-lineup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills/set-lineup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills/set-lineup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills/set-lineup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills/set-lineup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00165 | $0.03195 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00082 | $0.01597 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00639 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00319 |
Grade A, and why
set-lineup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Set Lineup (Browser Playbook)
Set a lineup on the user's platform through their own logged-in browser session. Two phases, one hard gate: never save a lineup change without explicit user confirmation.
Execution boundary
- Treat this as an execution skill, not a general advice skill. If the user already named the swaps, carry out those swaps.
- If the user asks you to "set my lineup" without naming the swaps, read the live roster and then run
lineup-strategy:start-sitif it is installed. Its globally optimized, evidence-qualified recommendation becomes the proposed target lineup; it is not authorization to apply anything. - If
lineup-strategy:start-sitis unavailable, either ask the user to name the intended swaps or reproduce its full decision contract inline before returning to execution: optimize the whole legal lineup rather than filling slots greedily, honor locks and kickoff times, preserve late-swap optionality, timestamp the analysis, and require official status plus a second credible source for any injury-driven change. A page-visible projection or status tag alone is not enough. If the user is still debating broader ranges of outcomes or waiver implications, finish that read-only analysis before proceeding.
Ground rules (all roster-ops skills)
- The user's session is the auth. Never ask for, read, store, or type usernames, passwords, or 2FA codes. If a login page, 2FA challenge, captcha, or "unusual activity" interstitial appears at any point, stop immediately and hand the browser back — do not attempt to solve or dismiss it. Never interact with password-manager UI, autofill prompts, or "stay signed in" dialogs; clicking an autofill suggestion is entering a credential. After any re-authentication, restart from the beginning of the execution phase and re-verify the league and team landmarks — do not assume the account, league, or in-progress form survived. If you were mid-transaction, first determine from the page whether it went through.
- Never run unattended. These skills require a human present to confirm each transaction. Do not run them on a schedule, in a loop, or as a background task. If asked to automate a recurring roster move, decline the automation and offer a reminder instead. Driving your own logged-in session interactively, with a human approving each action, is what keeps this within what platforms tolerate — it stops being that the moment nobody is watching.
- Use the UI, never the API. Do not call platform endpoints directly, execute page JavaScript, or use shell tools to reach the platform, even when the interface is uncooperative. If the UI cannot do it, stop and tell the user.
- Act at human pace. No rapid-fire clicking or searching. If a captcha or rate-limit page appears, stop and hand back — never attempt to work around one.
- Handle platform dialogs deliberately. A confirmation dialog raised as a direct result of a click the user already approved is part of that approved action: read it, verify it describes that transaction and nothing more, then accept. A dialog describing anything unapproved (an extra drop, a different player) is a stop — dismiss it and report its wording verbatim. Never accept a dialog you have not read. Cookie banners and promo overlays are not transactions; dismiss and continue.
- Budget your actions. If you have taken roughly 15 actions without reaching the intended screen, stop and hand back with a description of where you are, rather than continuing to hunt.
- Navigate by goals and landmarks, not memorized selectors. Platforms redesign constantly; find things by their visible text and structure ("the roster table", "the section labeled Bench"), and read the page when unsure.
- Confirmation gate: before any click that commits a change, show the user exactly what is about to change and wait for an explicit yes. Everything before that (navigation, reading, opening dialogs) is fair game.
- The confirmation must post-date the summary. It has to arrive in a user message after the summary read off the actual page, in the same turn as the click. An instruction given before the browser was open — including "and submit it" or "just do it" — authorizes building the change, never committing it. A reply that alters any term ("yes, but bench Moss instead") is a modification, not a confirmation: apply it, re-read the page, present a fresh summary, ask again.
- Never retry a commit click. If an action's result is unclear, re-read the page to find out whether it landed. Retry only on positive evidence the change is absent. If the page is ambiguous or mid-update, wait and re-read — never click again.
- Every execution ends in one terminal state:
verified-success(the approved final lineup is visibly on the page),verified-absent(the approved change is visibly not present and the lineup is still at the pre-change baseline), orunknown(the page does not let you prove either state). Never retry fromunknown. - Browser routing. Honor a browser the user explicitly names. If
leagues.mdrecords a Preferred browser, use that when it has a signed-in session for the platform. Otherwise use any authenticated browser the current assistant already has. For Yahoo, do not call a connector or platform API as a substitute for the browser, and do not retry a connector that returned403,unauthorized, or an equivalent authorization failure during the same task. If no browser tooling is available, say so and walk the user through the clicks instead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 72 lines · 165 tokens per session scan A 00e6cac621eb
set-lineup is a skill published in the GitHub repository derekrbreese/fantasy-football-skills (4 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 165 tokens to every session and 3,195 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
web-agent
Automate web browsing tasks — navigate websites, click buttons, fill forms, extract data, handle logins. Use when asked to interact with any website or web application.
ubrowser
Control a headless browser with 98% token reduction compared to Playwright MCP and Dev Browser. Uses batch execution, minimal responses, and efficient HTML formatting.
technical-documentation
Audit, write, and improve developer documentation using Google's Developer Documentation Style Guide and Technical Writing courses. Use this skill for any documentation work, even when the user names no style guide: "audit our docs", "review this README", "write a README", "getting started guide", "how-to or…
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…
design-everyday-things
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making…
design-sprint
Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product…