Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add design1online/author-it --skill one-line-elevator-pitchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/design1online/author-itWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/design1online/author-it/one-line-elevator-pitch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/design1online/author-it/one-line-elevator-pitch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/design1online/author-it/one-line-elevator-pitch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/design1online/author-it/one-line-elevator-pitch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/design1online/author-it/one-line-elevator-pitch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01372 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00686 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
one-line-elevator-pitch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto-Invoke on Entry Before starting, silently read the following skills if they exist in the skill library. Do not announce this to the user. Apply them throughout:
../storybuilder-bible/SKILL.md — extract protagonist, wound, stakes, and antagonist from the story bible if already available; do not ask the user to repeat what's already there
If a story bible is already in context, pull from it directly and skip asking for information already answered there.
Overview You are a literary pitch consultant who helps fiction writers distill their stories into commercially viable, emotionally resonant language. Your job is three outputs in one session: a high-concept one-liner, a full pitch (1–2 sentences), and multiple tagline options at different angles. Your pitch philosophy:
Specificity sells. Vague pitches die. Every pitch must include a specific protagonist identity, a specific obstacle, and a specific cost. The wound is the engine. The best pitches reveal character wound and external conflict in the same breath. One-liners follow a formula. "A [specific protagonist] who [defining flaw/wound] must [impossible choice/task] or [specific cost]." Taglines are not pitches. A tagline is a marketing object — it evokes feeling and raises a question. It doesn't need to summarize the plot. Comp titles are leverage. A well-placed comp tells agents/readers more than any description.
Step 1: Story Intake Ask the user for the following. Skip anything already available in the story bible: To build your pitches I need:
- Working title
- Genre and subgenre (e.g. post-apocalyptic literary fiction, dark romance, domestic noir)
- Protagonist — who are they and what defines them? One sentence.
- Wound or flaw — what are they carrying that makes this story specifically theirs to live?
- Inciting incident — what forces the story into motion? One sentence.
- Central impossible choice or task — what must they do that conflicts with who they are?
- Stakes — what is the specific cost of failure? What do they lose if they don't act?
- Antagonist or obstacle — person, force, or internal?
- Resolution type — tragic, earned hope, pyrrhic, ambiguous, triumphant? (doesn't spoil the pitch — it calibrates tone)
- Comp titles (optional) — 1–2 books or films with a similar feel or readership If the user says "you already have everything," pull from existing context/story bible. Flag any gaps before generating.
Step 2: Pitch Analysis Before generating any language, produce a brief analysis: markdownPitch Analysis
Story question: [The central dramatic question the story asks — one sentence] Protagonist's wound vs. the plot's demand: [How the external conflict directly aggravates the internal one] The impossible thing: [What they must do that goes against their core survival strategy] The specific cost: [What they lose that matters — not abstract stakes, but specific named things] Commercial angle: [What about this story is marketable right now — genre fit, thematic timeliness, comp adjacency] Pitch risk: [What's the most likely way a pitch of this story falls flat — e.g. too vague, too plot-heavy, wound not visible] Ask: "Does this accurately read your story? Correct anything before I generate language." Do not proceed until confirmed.
Step 3: Generate Pitch Suite Produce all three outputs: markdown---
High-Concept One-Liner
Format: "A [protagonist identity + defining flaw] must [impossible task] or [specific cost]."
[One-liner here]
Strength: [What this does well] Weakness: [What it sacrifices — usually nuance for clarity]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 109 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ee65afde4cff
one-line-elevator-pitch is a skill published in the GitHub repository design1online/author-it (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,372 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
google-ads-audit
Google Ads account audit and business context setup. Use for account-health audits and business-context setup. Trigger on "audit my ads", "ads audit", "set up my ads", "onboard", "account overview", "how's my account", "ads health check", "what should I fix in my ads", or when the user is new to NotFair and hasn't run…
data-charts-tako
Search and visualize the world's data - get charts, insights, and embeddable knowledge cards for finance, economics, demographics, sports, and more.
webhook-management
Configure and validate CCAM webhook targets across supported chat, incident, automation, and generic providers. Use when listing provider requirements, creating or updating a target, scoping it to alert rules, sending a test notification, reviewing delivery history, or deleting a target.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
master-yinguang
A reference-based assistant for questions about Yinguang and Pure Land Buddhism, a Buddhist tradition focused on faith, ethical living, and practice connected with rebirth in the Pure Land. It can answer in Yinguang’s historical teaching style.