Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/designpipe/exfig/openspec-archive-changenpx skills add DesignPipe/exfig --skill openspec-archive-changegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DesignPipe/exfigWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/designpipe/exfig/openspec-archive-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/designpipe/exfig/openspec-archive-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/designpipe/exfig/openspec-archive-change.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00927 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-archive-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to openspec-archive-change — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes. Use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select.Show only active changes (not already archived). Include the schema used for each change if available.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
-
Check artifact completion status
Run
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonto check artifact completion.Parse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being usedartifacts: List of artifacts with their status (doneor other)
If any artifacts are not
done:- Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
-
Check task completion status
Read the tasks file (typically
tasks.md) to check for incomplete tasks.Count tasks marked with
- [ ](incomplete) vs- [x](complete).If incomplete tasks found:
- Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
If no tasks file exists: Proceed without task-related warning.
-
Assess delta spec sync state
Check for delta specs at
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/. If none exist, proceed without sync prompt.If delta specs exist:
- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at
openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md - Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
- Show a combined summary before prompting
Prompt options:
- If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
- If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
If user chooses sync, execute /opsx:sync logic (use the openspec-sync-specs skill). Proceed to archive regardless of choice.
- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at
-
Perform the archive
Create the archive directory if it doesn't exist:
mkdir -p openspec/changes/archiveGenerate target name using current date:
YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>Check if target already exists:
- If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
- If no: Move the change directory to archive
mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name> -
Display summary
Show archive completion summary including:
- Change name
- Schema that was used
- Archive location
- Whether specs were synced (if applicable)
- Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
Output On Success
## Archive Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs (or "No delta specs" or "Sync skipped")
All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
Guardrails
- Always prompt for change selection if not provided
- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
- Show clear summary of what happened
- If sync is requested, use openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven)
- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 115 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A a2717ab2b458
openspec-archive-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository DesignPipe/exfig (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 927 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to openspec-archive-change, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage
Skill "triage" from K9i-0/ccpocket, covering issue / pr triage, 原則, phase 0: 種別判定, prフロー and phase 1: intake / ready判定.
update-store
ストア情報の更新自動化 — スクリーンショット撮影(シミュレーター × モック画面 × Marionette MCP)とメタデータテキスト更新。ストア更新、スクショ更新、App Store / Google Play のメタデータ更新、リリースノート作成の際に使用すること。.
mobile-automation
MCP (dart-mcp + Marionette) を使ったFlutterアプリのE2E自動化・UI検証ガイド。シミュレーターでのUI動作確認、モックプレビュー検証、Bridge経由のE2Eテスト、スクリーンショット撮影など、アプリの動作検証が必要なときに使う。「動作確認して」「UIを検証して」「E2Eテスト」「シミュレーターで確認」「モックで確認」と言われたときや、UI変更後の検証フェーズで使用すること。.
submit-store-review
App Store Connect・Google Playの現在の公開版をAPIで調べ、既存の最新安定ビルドとの差分から4言語のリリースノートを作成し、CLI/APIで審査へ提出・再提出する。新しいビルドを作るrelease-appとは分離し、「最新を審査提出して」「ストア審査へ提出して」「App Reviewに出して」「Google Playの審査を進めて」「却下対応して再提出して」と依頼されたときに使用する。.
flutter-ui-design
SSOT (Single Source of Truth) + UDF (Unidirectional Data Flow) に基づく設計。.
release-app
アプリのリリース(バージョンbump + CHANGELOG + タグ → GH Actions で自動ビルド・配布)。iOS / Android / macOS / Linux / Windows の任意の組み合わせでリリースできる。「リリース」「バージョン上げて」「リリースして」と言われたときに使う。.