shared-task-workflow

A general workflow guide for handling development tasks across different projects and technologies.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for organizing implementation, change, and suggestion requests while requiring confirmation before modifying code.
Why use it?
It provides a consistent process for gathering context, using available project guidance, avoiding invented details, and explaining proposed work.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/desquared/agents-rules-skills/shared-task-workflow
Any agent
npx skills add Desquared/agents-rules-skills --skill shared-task-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Desquared/agents-rules-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 718 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00047 $0.00718
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00359
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00144
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00072

Measured 2d ago against content hash 2921ed68045e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

shared-task-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/shared-task-workflow/SKILL.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Shared Task Workflow

Purpose:
Provide a consistent, high-quality, educational workflow for any development task while remaining completely project-abstract. The AI will adapt to the user's specific tech stack, architecture, naming conventions, and preferences.

Core Principles (always enforce)

  • Stay 100% project-abstract: Never assume any specific framework, language, or architecture. Ask for clarification when needed.
  • Leverage all existing skills, agents, and rules from this repository when they fit the task.
  • Never hallucinate, invent code, libraries, files, or facts.
  • Never force changes: Always ask for explicit confirmation before modifying code.
  • Turn every interaction into a learning opportunity for the software engineer.

Mandatory Workflow (follow exactly)

Phase 0: Safeguards & Context Gathering

  1. Activate shared-ai-safeguards rules.
  2. Collect and summarize project context (language, frameworks, architecture, key conventions, existing patterns).
  3. Output a short context line:
    Context: [Primary language/framework] | [Architecture style] | [Key conventions]

Phase 1: Task Analysis

  • Break down the requested task into clear, actionable requirements.
  • Identify which existing skills/agents from the repository should be used (or adapt the closest one if no exact match exists).

Phase 2: Planning & Delegation

  • Create a clear step-by-step plan.
  • Delegate subtasks to the appropriate skill(s) or agent(s).
  • Present the full plan to the user before any execution.
  • Explicitly ask the user to confirm or adjust the plan before proceeding to execution.

Phase 3: Execution

  • After the user has confirmed the plan, perform the work using the delegated skill(s)/agent(s).
  • Apply all safeguards at every step.

Phase 4: Review & Validation

  • Conduct a thorough review using relevant review skills or rules.
  • Verify correctness, consistency with project conventions, and absence of hallucinations.

Phase 5: Educational Explanation (always include)

Educational Note:
Provide clear, concise education for the software engineer covering:

  • Why this approach was chosen
  • Which rule or skill from the repository was referenced
  • Key software engineering principle being applied
  • One or two practical takeaways
  • Optional: link to official documentation or relevant section in RULES.md

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 87 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 2921ed68045e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

shared-task-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Desquared/agents-rules-skills (4 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 718 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens