Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Detective-XH/DocGraph --skill assessment-drift-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Detective-XH/DocGraphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/detective-xh/docgraph/assessment-drift-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/detective-xh/docgraph/assessment-drift-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/detective-xh/docgraph/assessment-drift-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/detective-xh/docgraph/assessment-drift-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/detective-xh/docgraph/assessment-drift-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00864 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
assessment-drift-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assessment/Research Drift Audit
Invocation — Claude Code:
Skill("assessment-drift-audit")| OpenCode / Codex: use triggers above.
Runs the DocGraph assessment drift audit and presents findings for human review. The audit is advisory — findings highlight candidates for action, not authoritative rulings.
Execution
- Model: Haiku (query) → Sonnet (remediation suggestions if requested)
- Effort: Low
- Advisor: Not required
- Core computation: done by DocGraph's
GetDriftFindingsengine, not by this skill
Step 1: Check index status
docgraph_status
Confirm:
assessment_driftpack is listed under Domain Packs- Research metadata is indexed (docs with research metadata > 0)
If assessment_drift is not listed, the binary is too old or the pack was never registered —
tell the user to upgrade DocGraph and run docgraph index --force.
Step 2: Run the drift audit
docgraph_context task="research/assessment drift audit" format=drift_audit
This calls DocGraph's GetDriftFindings engine, which checks:
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
research.stale_assessment |
valid_until date has passed; assessment is expired |
research.unverified_evidence |
last_verified date is older than 180 days (configurable) |
research.competing_interpretations |
Multiple documents share the same claim_id but have conflicting confidence or analyst_status |
research.superseded_claim |
A research document with superseded_by set is still referenced by other active documents |
research.impacted_deliverable |
A deliverable (deliverable_id set) is linked to an expired assessment |
Step 3: Present findings to the user
Group findings by severity (warnings first, then info).
For each finding:
- State the file path(s) and finding code
- Show the message and evidence from the finding
- Suggest a concrete remediation (below) — but do NOT make the change without confirmation
Remediation patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 9e3d1c755124
assessment-drift-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Detective-XH/DocGraph (9 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 864 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
assessment-drift-audit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assessment-drift-auditDetective-XH/DocGraph | Skill | 9 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ori-memoryaayoawoyemi/Ori-Mnemos | Skill | 335 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| tela-wikizcag/tela | Skill | 91 | 6d ago | AGPL-3.0 | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |
| okf-loomojamin/okf-loom | Skill | 8 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| document-as-you-goeduardoabreu81/livewiki | Skill | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code, Codex |
| bootstrap-wikieduardoabreu81/livewiki | Skill | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| context-atlasmoelomda/context-atlas | Skill | 0 | 25d ago | MIT | A | 76 | Codex |