Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony/form-types-validationnpx skills add dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony --skill form-types-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dev-toolings/superpowers-symfonyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony/form-types-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony/form-types-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony/form-types-validation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00235 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
symfony:form-types-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Form Types Validation (Symfony)
Use when
- Hardening access-control or validation boundaries.
- Aligning voters/security expressions with domain rules.
Default workflow
- Map actor/resource/action decision matrix.
- Implement voter/constraint logic at the right boundary.
- Wire checks at controllers and API operations.
- Test allowed/forbidden/invalid paths comprehensively.
Guardrails
- Avoid policy logic duplication across layers.
- Do not leak privileged state via error detail.
- Preserve explicit deny behavior for sensitive actions.
Progressive disclosure
- Use this file for execution posture and risk controls.
- Open references when deep implementation details are needed.
Output contract
- Security boundary updates.
- Integration points enforcing decisions.
- Negative-path test results.
References
reference.mddocs/complexity-tiers.md
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 43 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 6a76d41d0973
symfony:form-types-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository dev-toolings/superpowers-symfony (208 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 235 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
application
Use when creating application layer artifacts for a NestJS bounded context — use cases, CQRS command/query handlers, DTOs, ports (cross-module interfaces), application services, or read model projections. Supports three patterns: plain UseCase (A), CQRS native (B), and Handler-as-Orchestrator (C).
domain
Use when creating domain layer artifacts for a NestJS bounded context — entities (AggregateRoot), value objects, domain events, repository interfaces, domain services, validators, or data builders. Covers Hexagonal Architecture + DDD patterns with NestJS CQRS native event support.
event-listeners
Use when creating event listeners that react to domain events — same-BC side effects (projections, audit, cache), cross-BC reactions (another bounded context consuming events), or bridge listeners (WebSocket broadcast, RabbitMQ publish, email). Covers listener taxonomy, placement rules, Strategy+Gateway pattern for…
infrastructure
Use when creating infrastructure layer artifacts for a NestJS bounded context — Prisma repositories, in-memory repositories (testing), model mappers, NestJS module wiring, adapters (port implementations), or event handler infrastructure. Repository is pure persistence with no event dispatch.
review-subdomain
Reviews a NestJS bounded context implementation for Hexagonal Architecture + DDD + CQRS compliance. Checks 6 dimensions — domain purity, application patterns, infrastructure isolation, presentation concerns, testing coverage, and module organization. Produces a structured Pass/Warning/Fail report.
presentation
Use when creating presentation layer artifacts for a NestJS bounded context — REST controllers, request DTOs with class-validator, Swagger decorators, custom validators, error filters, or API documentation. Covers the HTTP boundary with proper validation and error mapping.