summary

summary is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from devcodex-labs/devcodex. It costs 39 tokens per session (952 once invoked), scanned A, original, AGPL-3.0.

写入会话摘要到记忆日文件。区别于 memory Skill(会话记录读写)。任务结束前与 memory Skill 配合完成记忆持久化。.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/devcodex-labs/devcodex/summary
Any agent
npx skills add devcodex-labs/devcodex --skill summary
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/devcodex-labs/devcodex

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for summary

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devcodex-labs/devcodex/summary.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/devcodex-labs/devcodex/summary)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devcodex-labs/devcodex/summary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devcodex-labs/devcodex/summary.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 952 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00039 $0.00952
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00476
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00190
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00095

Measured today against content hash e9532320beff, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

summary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

content/skills/summary/SKILL.md · 73 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed AGPL-3.0

The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 73 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A e9532320beff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

summary is a skill published in the GitHub repository devcodex-labs/devcodex (193 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 952 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.