Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook --skill develop-code-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/develop-code-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/develop-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/develop-code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/develop-code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook/develop-code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.05075 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.02030 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01015 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00507 |
Grade A, and why
develop-code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 415 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A b52748c89a2a
develop-code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository developer239/michals-opencode-cookbook (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 5,075 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
remember
Record why something is the way it is — a decision and its reasoning, a lesson that cost time, or a standing constraint. Use when the reasoning behind a choice would be expensive to reconstruct later.
review
Review a change with what this repository knows about it — who depends on the file, which tests cover it, what broke here before, and what the repo has written down. Use before approving a diff, opening a PR, or when asked to review.
misuzu
Respond to PR review comments semi-automatically. Fetches all review threads and comments, splits them into logical units, fixes and commits one unit at a time, then replies and resolves review threads. Use when the user wants to address PR review feedback or respond to review comments.
pr-style
Pull request style guidelines covering title, body, assignee, and label selection. Use when writing or proposing GitHub pull requests, including direct gh pr create invocations outside the /pr skill.
socratic-review
Socratic code review and refactoring session — whether it's your own code, a teammate's PR, or something you inherited. Leads you to see the issues through questions, names smells and moves precisely, then closes with a concrete plan.