Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills --skill ai-output-validationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/ai-output-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/ai-output-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/ai-output-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/ai-output-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/ai-output-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01064 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00532 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
ai-output-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
AI models produce unstructured text by default. In production pipelines, unstructured outputs cause brittle parsing, unexpected behavior, and silent failures. This skill enforces structured output generation and validation at every AI system boundary.
When to Use
- Any AI pipeline where output is used programmatically (not just displayed to a user)
- When AI output feeds into another system, database, or agent
- When building agentic systems that make decisions based on AI output
- When AI generates code, SQL, JSON, or other structured formats
Process
Step 1: Define Output Schema Before Prompting
- Define the exact structure you need BEFORE writing the prompt.
- Use JSON Schema or Pydantic/Zod models to formalize the expected output.
- Example schema:
{ "type": "object", "required": ["summary", "action", "confidence"], "properties": { "summary": {"type": "string", "maxLength": 200}, "action": {"type": "string", "enum": ["approve", "reject", "review"]}, "confidence": {"type": "number", "minimum": 0, "maximum": 1} } } - Design the schema to be minimal — only what you actually need.
Verify: Schema is defined and versioned before any prompt is written.
Step 2: Prompt for Structured Output
- Explicitly instruct the model to output in your defined format.
- Include the schema or an example in the prompt.
- Use models/APIs that support structured output natively where available (OpenAI structured outputs, Gemini JSON mode, Anthropic tool use).
- Prompt pattern:
Respond ONLY with valid JSON matching this schema: {schema} Do not include explanation or markdown. Output raw JSON only.
Verify: Prompt explicitly requests structured output with schema reference.
Step 3: Validate and Parse Output
- Parse the output against your schema — never use raw AI output directly.
- If parsing fails:
- Log the raw output and the parse error
- Retry with a clarification prompt (max 2 retries)
- After 2 failures: return a structured error, not a crash
- Validate semantic constraints beyond the schema:
- Is the
confidencescore consistent with theaction? - Are referenced IDs in the database?
- Are dates in the valid range?
- Is the
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 120 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A abd8db450e1f
ai-output-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills (65 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,064 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
constraint-driven-development
Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or…
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
api-and-interface-design
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.