Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/goal-driven-executionnpx skills add DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills --skill goal-driven-executiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/goal-driven-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/goal-driven-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/goal-driven-execution.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00924 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00462 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
goal-driven-execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
Andrej Karpathy's key insight: "LLMs are exceptionally good at looping until they meet specific goals. Don't tell it what to do — give it success criteria and watch it go."
This skill converts vague imperative instructions ("make the login work") into declarative goals with concrete, testable success criteria. Agents with clear goals self-correct autonomously. Agents with vague goals produce vague results and require constant intervention.
When to Use
- Before starting any multi-step task
- When a task has been described imperatively ("do X, then Y, then Z")
- When you're unsure how you'll know when you're "done"
- For long-running or complex implementations
Process
Step 1: Extract the Underlying Goal
- Read the full request.
- Ask: What is the user trying to achieve, not just what they asked for?
- Write the goal as: "The task is complete when [observable, verifiable outcome]."
Example transformation:
- ❌ Imperative: "Add error handling to the API."
- ✅ Goal: "The task is complete when: all API endpoints return structured error responses for 4xx/5xx cases, error responses include a
code,message, andrequestId, and the existing tests pass."
Verify: The goal statement is observable and testable by a third party.
Step 2: Define Success Criteria
- List 3–7 specific, binary success criteria:
Success when: - [ ] All existing tests pass - [ ] New behavior X is demonstrated by test Y - [ ] No regressions in file Z - [ ] Manual check: [describe what to look for] - Each criterion must be falsifiable — you can clearly state when it passes or fails.
Verify: Every criterion can be checked without the original author.
Step 3: Define the Execution Plan
- Break the goal into ordered steps, each with its own verify check:
1. [Step] → verify: [command or check] 2. [Step] → verify: [command or check] 3. [Step] → verify: [command or check] - Identify the first failure mode — what's most likely to go wrong? Plan for it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 97 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A aebf80ca9801
goal-driven-execution is a skill published in the GitHub repository DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills (65 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 924 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
constraint-driven-development
Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or…
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
api-and-interface-design
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.