Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills --skill think-before-codinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/think-before-coding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/think-before-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/think-before-coding/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/think-before-coding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/developersglobal/ai-agent-skills/think-before-coding.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00921 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
think-before-coding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
AI agents default to writing code immediately — even when the request is ambiguous, the context is incomplete, or multiple valid interpretations exist. This skill forces a deliberate thinking phase before any implementation begins.
The result: fewer rewrites, fewer wrong-direction implementations, and fewer "I assumed X" surprises.
When to Use
Activate this skill before writing any code when:
- The request is ambiguous or underspecified
- Multiple valid implementations exist
- You are unsure about an existing system's constraints
- The task touches security, data integrity, or public APIs
- You feel the urge to "just start coding" to make progress
Process
Phase 1: Understand the Request
- Read the full request — Do not skim. Re-read once.
- Identify ambiguities — List every decision you would have to make silently:
- What counts as "success"?
- What are the inputs and expected outputs?
- What should NOT change?
- Are there existing patterns to follow?
- Surface assumptions — Write them out: "I am assuming X because Y."
- Check for contradictions — Does the request contradict itself or existing code?
Verify: Can you state the goal in one clear sentence? If not, ask before proceeding.
Phase 2: Clarify Before Acting
- If genuinely ambiguous, ask a focused clarifying question — not a list of 10 questions. Pick the one blocker.
- If multiple valid approaches exist, present 2–3 options with tradeoffs, then ask which to proceed with.
- If something seems wrong with the request, say so directly — don't silently work around it.
Verify: You have a clear, agreed-upon interpretation of the task.
Phase 3: State Your Plan
- Before writing code, state:
- What you will build
- What you will NOT touch
- What success looks like (your verification criteria)
- For multi-step tasks, write a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check] 2. [Step] → verify: [check] 3. [Step] → verify: [check]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 879ef522823a
think-before-coding is a skill published in the GitHub repository DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills (207 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…
performance-optimization
Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.
test-driven-development
Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug…
context-engineering
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
git-workflow-and-versioning
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, splitting uncommitted work in a messy working tree into clean atomic commits, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple…
observability-and-instrumentation
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.