Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DevRik99/forge-mcp --skill scoutqa-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevRik99/forge-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/devrik99/forge-mcp/scoutqa-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devrik99/forge-mcp/scoutqa-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devrik99/forge-mcp/scoutqa-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/devrik99/forge-mcp/scoutqa-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/devrik99/forge-mcp/scoutqa-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.03049 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01524 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00610 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
scoutqa-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 376 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 6c09a43984b0
scoutqa-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository DevRik99/forge-mcp (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 3,049 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
browse
Drive a real browser through Aside: open a page, read it, click through a flow, take screenshots, check console errors. (gstack).
playwright-cli
A command-line tool for controlling Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit browsers, including navigation, page interaction, screenshots, PDFs, and recorded actions.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
create-verification-skill
Create a repo-local verification skill and exhaustive feature map for driving a real app through its UI, CLI, or API. Use for "create a verification skill", "make a verify skill for this repo", or "document how agents can verify this app".
browser-qa
A browser-based quality check for deployed web pages and user flows. It uses browser automation to test rendering, navigation, forms, interactions, responsive behaviour, and accessibility-related issues.
test-electron-app
Drive the real running PostHog Electron app (live tRPC, workspace-server, real data) over CDP with agent-browser. Connect to the running app on port 9222, test desktop changes against a local Django stack, snapshot the accessibility tree, inspect network requests, and screenshot only when explicitly asked. Use when…