review-flow: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/e2e/SKILL.md

e2e is a skill for Claude Code from DGouron/review-flow. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,383 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for creating and troubleshooting Playwright end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests exercise a complete feature or user flow, and Playwright is the testing tool used here.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create tests for web workflows or API endpoints, investigate flaky tests, run the test suite, and inspect test reports.
Why use it?
It provides the project's test locations, conventions, commands, fixtures, and debugging steps so new tests fit the existing setup.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is DGouron/review-flow's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on review-flow itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything review-flow configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import { TEST_WEBHOOKS, TEST_PAYLOADS } from "../fixtures/test-data";.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to DGouron/review-flow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DGouron/review-flow/master/.claude/skills/e2e/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DGouron/review-flow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for e2e

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for e2e

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/e2e.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,383 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01383
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00553
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00277
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00138

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 10196e940b06, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

e2e scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/e2e/SKILL.md · 241 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Playwright E2E Testing Guide

Persona

Read .claude/roles/code-reviewer.md — adopt this profile and follow all its rules.

Activation

This skill activates for:

  • Creating a new e2e test
  • Debugging a flaky test
  • Testing a critical feature (complete API workflow)

Architecture

src/tests/e2e/
├── fixtures/
│   └── test-data.ts          # Test data (webhooks, payloads, etc.)
├── specs/
│   ├── setup.ts              # Server setup (run once)
│   └── <context>/
│       └── <feature>.spec.ts # Tests per feature
└── utils/
    └── test-helpers.ts       # Helpers (API calls, server setup)

Commands

Command Usage
yarn e2e Run all tests
yarn e2e:debug Debug mode with inspector
yarn test:e2e:report View HTML report

Workflow: Create a New Test

1. Identify the Context

specs/
├── setup.ts                # Setup (do not touch)
├── webhook/                # Webhook endpoint tests
├── review/                 # Review workflow tests
└── health/                 # Health check tests

2. Write the Test

// specs/webhook/github-webhook.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";

test.describe("GitHub Webhook", () => {
  test("should accept a valid pull request event", async ({ request }) => {
    const response = await request.post("/webhooks/github", {
      headers: {
        "content-type": "application/json",
        "x-github-event": "pull_request",
        "x-hub-signature-256": "sha256=valid-signature",
      },
      data: {
        action: "opened",
        pull_request: {
          number: 42,
          title: "feat: add new feature",
          head: { ref: "feat/new-feature" },
          base: { ref: "main" },
        },
        repository: { full_name: "org/repo" },
        sender: { login: "developer" },
      },
    });

    expect(response.status()).toBe(200);
  });

  test("should reject an invalid payload", async ({ request }) => {
    const response = await request.post("/webhooks/github", {
      data: {},
    });

    expect(response.status()).toBe(400);
  });
});

Read the full file on GitHub · 241 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 241 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 10196e940b06

Subscribe to this mod's changes

e2e is a skill published in the GitHub repository DGouron/review-flow (44 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,383 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.

promptfoo/promptfoo · 11 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens

trace

Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone, ends with a final-integration review of the fix. Trigger with /hyperflow:trace, "debug this", "find the root cause", "why…

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace · 84 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

brooks-health

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 156 tokens

brooks-test

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 161 tokens