review-flow: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/solid/SKILL.md

solid is a skill for Claude Code from DGouron/review-flow. It costs 30 tokens per session (2,530 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of software design rules for keeping modules and components focused and easier to change. SOLID is a five-part approach from Robert C. Martin's Clean Architecture book.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing design, deciding how to refactor code, creating modules or components, or checking whether each class or function has a clear responsibility.
Why use it?
It helps identify code with too many responsibilities or dependencies before changes make it harder to maintain. It gives code reviews and refactoring decisions a shared set of criteria.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is DGouron/review-flow's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on review-flow itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything review-flow configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to DGouron/review-flow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DGouron/review-flow/master/.claude/skills/solid/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DGouron/review-flow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for solid

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for solid

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,530 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.02530
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01012
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00506
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00253

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 10ff9a040c92, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

solid scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

fetch(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]>;
.claude/skills/solid/SKILL.md · 332 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SOLID Principles - Clean Architecture Reference

Based on "Clean Architecture" by Robert C. Martin, Chapter 7-11 (pages 57-90)

Persona

Read .claude/roles/architect.md — adopt this profile and follow all its rules.

When to Activate

This skill activates for:

  • Code review with design concerns
  • Refactoring decisions
  • Designing new modules or components
  • Evaluating class/function responsibilities

SRP: Single Responsibility Principle

"A module should have one, and only one, reason to change." — Clean Architecture, p.62

Definition

A module should be responsible to one, and only one, actor (stakeholder/user group).

In ReviewFlow

// ❌ Bad: one class, three actors driving change
//   - the developer (trigger flow)
//   - the platform integration (GitLab/GitHub API)
//   - the dashboard (stats persistence)
class ReviewService {
  async triggerReview(mr: TrackedMr): Promise<void> {
    /* developer concern: enqueue a review job */
  }
  async fetchThreads(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]> {
    /* platform concern: hit GitLab/GitHub API */
  }
  async saveStats(stats: ReviewStats): Promise<void> {
    /* dashboard concern: persist aggregated metrics */
  }
}

// ✅ Good: one module per actor
export class TriggerReviewUseCase implements UseCase<TriggerReviewInput, void> {
  constructor(private readonly queue: QueueGateway) {}
  async execute(input: TriggerReviewInput): Promise<void> {
    await this.queue.enqueue(input);
  }
}

export interface ThreadFetchGateway {
  fetch(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]>;
}

export class ReviewStatsPresenter {
  present(stats: ReviewStats): ReviewStatsViewModel {
    return { average: stats.averageScore, total: stats.totalReviews };
  }
}

OCP: Open-Closed Principle

"A software artifact should be open for extension but closed for modification." — Clean Architecture, p.70

Definition

You should be able to change the behavior of a module by adding new code, not changing existing code.

Read the full file on GitHub · 332 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 332 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 10ff9a040c92

Subscribe to this mod's changes

solid is a skill published in the GitHub repository DGouron/review-flow (44 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,530 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

brooks-harness

Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 271 tokens

release

Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 135 tokens

new-skill

Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 145 tokens

brooks-audit

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 143 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

brooks-debt

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 131 tokens