Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DGouron/review-flow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DGouron/review-flow/master/.claude/skills/solid/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DGouron/review-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dgouron/review-flow/solid.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02530 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01012 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00506 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00253 |
Grade A, and why
solid scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
fetch(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]>; How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SOLID Principles - Clean Architecture Reference
Based on "Clean Architecture" by Robert C. Martin, Chapter 7-11 (pages 57-90)
Persona
Read .claude/roles/architect.md — adopt this profile and follow all its rules.
When to Activate
This skill activates for:
- Code review with design concerns
- Refactoring decisions
- Designing new modules or components
- Evaluating class/function responsibilities
SRP: Single Responsibility Principle
"A module should have one, and only one, reason to change." — Clean Architecture, p.62
Definition
A module should be responsible to one, and only one, actor (stakeholder/user group).
In ReviewFlow
// ❌ Bad: one class, three actors driving change
// - the developer (trigger flow)
// - the platform integration (GitLab/GitHub API)
// - the dashboard (stats persistence)
class ReviewService {
async triggerReview(mr: TrackedMr): Promise<void> {
/* developer concern: enqueue a review job */
}
async fetchThreads(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]> {
/* platform concern: hit GitLab/GitHub API */
}
async saveStats(stats: ReviewStats): Promise<void> {
/* dashboard concern: persist aggregated metrics */
}
}
// ✅ Good: one module per actor
export class TriggerReviewUseCase implements UseCase<TriggerReviewInput, void> {
constructor(private readonly queue: QueueGateway) {}
async execute(input: TriggerReviewInput): Promise<void> {
await this.queue.enqueue(input);
}
}
export interface ThreadFetchGateway {
fetch(mrId: MergeRequestId): Promise<Thread[]>;
}
export class ReviewStatsPresenter {
present(stats: ReviewStats): ReviewStatsViewModel {
return { average: stats.averageScore, total: stats.totalReviews };
}
}
OCP: Open-Closed Principle
"A software artifact should be open for extension but closed for modification." — Clean Architecture, p.70
Definition
You should be able to change the behavior of a module by adding new code, not changing existing code.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 332 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 10ff9a040c92
solid is a skill published in the GitHub repository DGouron/review-flow (44 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,530 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
brooks-harness
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut…
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…
new-skill
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…
brooks-audit
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized…
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
brooks-debt
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what…