Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills --skill cascade-predictiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/cascade-prediction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/cascade-prediction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/cascade-prediction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/cascade-prediction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/cascade-prediction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.02367 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.01184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00473 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
cascade-prediction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cascade Prediction — 脏腑传变预测法
R — 原文 (Reading)
五脏受气于其所生,传之于其所胜,气舍于其所生,死于其所不胜。 病之且死,必先传行,至其所不胜,病乃死。 ……五脏相通,移皆有次。五脏有病,则各传其所胜。
— 《黄帝内经·素问》,玉机真藏论篇第十九
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
系统中的问题不会停留在原地——它会沿着固定的路径向外传播。 素问用五脏相克的链条来描述这个传播路径: 肝(木)→脾(土)→肾(水)→心(火)→肺(金)→肝(木), 每个环节的问题都会传给"它所克"的下一个环节。
这个方法论的核心价值在于:问题不是随机扩散的,而是有方向、有次序的。 掌握了传播路径,就可以提前预判下一个受害的环节,在那里预先布防。
它包含三个关键操作: 第一,定位——当前问题出在哪个环节; 第二,画路径——按相克链推出问题的传播方向和顺序; 第三,设防——不等问题传到下一个环节,提前在那里加固。
这个思路迁移到任何有"环节A出问题会影响环节B"的系统都适用—— 组织管理、供应链、技术架构、生态链条,只要能画出"谁影响谁"的传递路径, 就能用传变预测来防患于未然。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 五脏传变路径与时间预测
- 问题: 五脏之病不治,会如何传变?何时会危及生命?
- 方法论的使用: 素问给出了完整的传变路径:肝受气于心(木生火)→传之于脾(木克土)→气舍于肾(水生木)→至肺而死(金克木)。心、脾、肺、肾各有类似的链条。并且给出了传变的时间预估:"法三月,若六月,若三日,若六日"。
- 结论: 传变有固定方向(所胜)和终点(所不胜),预判了路径就可以在中间环节阻断。
- 结果: 能预判疾病走向的医生("上工")可以在传变途中拦截,不能预判的("下工")只能被动应付。
案例 2: 外痹内传五脏
- 问题: 风寒湿引起的痹症(外感)如何影响内脏?
- 方法论的使用: 痹论指出:骨痹不已→内舍于肾,筋痹不已→内舍于肝,脉痹不已→内舍于心……外部的病邪沿着特定的对应关系逐步深入内脏。
- 结论: 外部问题如果持续不解决,会按固定路径向深层传播——从功能层(筋骨脉肌皮)传到核心层(五脏)。
- 结果: 提示必须在痹症尚在外层时就积极治疗,防止内传。
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 局部问题需评估全局影响: 某个部门/模块/组件出了问题,用户需要预测这个问题会沿着什么路径扩散,最终影响哪些环节。
- 预防性布防: 用户知道某处出了问题,想在问题扩散之前提前加固下游环节,而不是等问题传到再仓促应对。
- 复盘连锁故障: 系统已经发生了连锁崩溃,用户需要回溯问题的传播路径,理解为什么A坏了最终导致Z也坏了。
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "这个问题会不会引发其他问题?"
- "如果不处理会怎样?"
- "一处出问题,其他地方会不会跟着出事?"
- "需要提前在哪里布防?"
- "连锁反应/多米诺效应"
- "这个问题会扩散到什么范围?"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
context-adaptation的区别: 传变预测关注的是问题在时间维度上的扩散路径(下一步会怎样),因地制宜关注的是问题在空间维度上的环境适配(换个地方怎么办)。前者是纵向预测,后者是横向适配。 - 与
negative-feedback的区别: 传变预测是"问题沿着链条传播",亢害承制是"某个力量过度亢盛需要引入制衡"。前者是线性传播,后者是过冲-回调。
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
当 skill 被激活后, agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
定位当前问题所在的环节
- 将系统拆解为若干环节/模块/部门,确定问题当前出在哪一个环节。
- 完成标准: 明确标注"当前问题位置"以及该环节的核心功能。
-
画出传变路径图(相克链)
- 梳理系统中各环节之间的"谁影响谁"关系,画出传递链条。
- 从当前问题环节出发,沿传递方向逐级推导:问题会传到哪个环节?再下一个是哪个?
- 标记每个环节的"承受能力":哪些环节脆弱(容易传变),哪些环节有缓冲(可能阻断传播)。
- 完成标准: 产出一幅传变路径图,标注每一步的传播方向和预计影响时间。
- 判停条件: 若系统各环节完全独立无传递关系,则不存在传变路径,此 skill 不适用。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 148 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 934825165e46
cascade-prediction is a skill published in the GitHub repository dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills (42 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 2,367 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
article-magazine
Huashu / huashu-md-html-inspired magazine article layout for turning Markdown or notes into a polished long-form HTML essay.
card-xiaohongshu
Xiaohongshu-style knowledge cards, arranged as a swipeable multi-card carousel.
data-report
Turns CSV, Excel, or JSON data into a polished visual report page.
card-twitter
Twitter quote or data card designed to pair with a post.
poster-hero
Vertical poster or Moments-style share image with strong visual impact.
deck-ljg-present
A presentation template that converts an outline or Markdown document into large, poster-like slides while keeping the original wording, order, and content. It uses black, red, or yellow colour themes and assigns document elements to slide layouts.