Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills --skill root-cause-prioritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/root-cause-priority)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/root-cause-priority"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/root-cause-priority/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/root-cause-priority"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills/root-cause-priority.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01660 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
root-cause-priority scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
标本根结定位法
R — 原文 (Reading)
先病而后逆者治其本, 先逆而后病者治其本。 先病而后生中满者治其标, 先中满而后烦心者治其本。 病发而有余, 本而标之; 病发而不足, 标而本之。 能知六经标本者, 可以无惑于天下。
— 黄帝/岐伯, 病本第二十五、卫气第五十二
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
标本根结定位法是一个区分问题源头与末端, 据此确定干预优先级的决策框架。
-
识别标本: 在因果链中, 先发生的/根本原因是"本", 后发生的/继发症状是"标"。在空间上, 源头(四肢末端/根)是本, 末端(头面胸腹/结)是标。
-
缓急定序: 默认"治本"优先, 但有明确的例外——"中满"(急症/关键瓶颈)和"大小便不利"(功能受阻)必须先治标。急则治标, 缓则治本。
-
虚实影响排序: "病发而有余(实), 本而标之"——从本治起;"病发而不足(虚), 标而本之"——从标治起。虚证时系统承受力弱, 需要先缓解表面症状再追根溯源。
-
间甚并行: "间者并行, 甚者独行"——问题不太严重时可以标本同治, 问题严重时只能集中精力治一个。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 先病后逆的治本原则
- 问题: 先得病后出现气逆, 该治哪个?
- 方法论的使用: "先病而后逆者治其本"——原发病是本, 气逆是标(继发), 治原发病则气逆自消。
- 结论: 症状的出现顺序揭示了因果链, 先治因后治果。
- 结果: 治本则标自消, 避免了在继发症状上浪费精力。
案例 2: 中满的紧急优先
- 问题: 先得病后出现中满(腹部胀满), 按理应治本, 但中满很急, 怎么办?
- 方法论的使用: "先病而后生中满者治其标"——虽然中满是标(继发), 但它阻塞了核心通道, 必须先解决。
- 结论: 当标证(继发问题)威胁到系统核心功能时, 标的优先级临时提升。
- 结果: 先解决紧急阻塞, 再回头治本。
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
- 多问题纠缠: 面对一堆相互关联的问题, 不知道从哪个入手。
- 因果链追溯: 知道表现但不确定根因, 需要沿因果链回溯。
- 先治标还是先治本: 紧急问题(标)和根本问题(本)同时存在, 需要排序。
语言信号
- "问题太多了, 不知道先解决哪个"
- "根本原因到底是什么"
- "紧急的和重要的怎么平衡"
- "解决了A, B又冒出来了"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
excess-deficiency-decision的区别: 虚实补泻解决"方向(补/泻)", 标本根结解决"顺序(先/后)"。两者独立但经常串联。 - 与
timing-opportunity的区别: 标本根结是"做什么的优先级", 时机选择是"何时做的时机窗口"。
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
-
列出所有问题并建立因果链
- 列出所有问题, 标注相互之间的因果关系(A导致B, B导致C)。
- 完成标准: 有明确的因果链图, 标注了时间先后顺序。
-
区分标本
- 在因果链中: 先发生的/根本原因=本, 后发生的/继发表现=标。
- 完成标准: 每个问题标注了"本"或"标", 并说明判断依据。
-
检查紧急例外
- 是否存在"中满型"问题——虽然不是根因, 但阻塞了核心功能, 必须先解决?
- 完成标准: 识别并标注紧急例外, 给出优先级调整理由。
-
确定执行顺序
- 默认从本治起; 有紧急例外则先治标; 虚证时从标治起。
- 完成标准: 给出明确的执行顺序和每步的理由。
B — 边界 (Boundary) ★
不要在以下情况使用
- 问题孤立: 如果问题之间没有因果关系, 标本框架无法展开。
- 教条治本: 不是所有情况都应该"先治本", 紧急情况必须先治标。
失败模式
- 本标混淆: 把症状当原因, 在标上浪费精力而本持续恶化。
- 教条主义: 无论多急都坚持"先治本", 忽视了紧急标证的威胁。
作者的盲点
- 灵枢的标本主要关注时间先后和虚实, 现代问题还可能涉及资源约束、利益相关方优先级等额外维度, 需要扩展框架。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 123 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A a0d8a1a2d1d0
root-cause-priority is a skill published in the GitHub repository dhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills (52 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,660 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
root-cause-priority compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| root-cause-prioritydhicoc/wuyun-liuqi-skills | Skill | 52 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| alert-sopPM-Shawn/Abu-Cowork | Skill | 419 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| code-runnerzhinjs/zhin | Skill | 137 | yesterday | MIT | A | 87 | Claude Code, Codex |
| workflow-recoverymrpulor-gh/nuphus | Skill | 89 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| runtime-diagnosticszhinjs/zhin | Skill | 137 | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code, Codex |
| metago-developer-responsemetago-ai/metagolifeform | Skill | 6 | yesterday | MIT | A | 78 | Claude Code, Codex |
| metago-problem-tracemetago-ai/metagolifeform | Skill | 6 | yesterday | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |