Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Dicklesworthstone/repo_updater. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/main/.claude/skills/ru-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/repo_updaterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/ru-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/ru-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/ru-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/ru-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dicklesworthstone/repo_updater/ru-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02822 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00564 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
ru-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 289 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A de888ed27b23
ru-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dicklesworthstone/repo_updater (117 stars, last pushed 17d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,822 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
You are a senior code reviewer. You receive diffs via stdin.
mainframe
Use when Pi writes, reviews, or executes bash; use MAINFRAME tools, AWM, and guarded function execution when available.
mainframe
Discover MAINFRAME read-only shell helpers and route durable agent authority through its control plane when available.
review
Two-stage code review: spec compliance first, then code quality. Auto-triggered after implementation. Also available as /review.
devils-advocate
Challenge a plan, design, or PR by finding every flaw, risk, and wrong assumption. Use before committing to an architecture or shipping a major change.
naming-format
Use when reviewing file names, renaming files, fixing naming conventions, or auditing exports. Enforces consistent casing and suffix patterns.