Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add digipulse-engineering/GAAI-framework --skill review-inputgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/digipulse-engineering/GAAI-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/review-input)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/review-input"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/review-input/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/review-input"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/review-input.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00131 | $0.05448 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00052 | $0.02179 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00545 |
Grade A, and why
review-input scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 402 lines · 131 tokens per session scan A 1e5b17dbd092
review-input is a skill published in the GitHub repository digipulse-engineering/GAAI-framework (163 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 131 tokens to every session and 5,448 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
bcc-throughline
BCC global progress cockpit (plans.md/progress.md/findings.md). Slash: /bcc-throughline · chat: bcc:throughline · "where are we" · reprioritize · resume after /clear. Not for coding or full PLAN grill.
deal-desk
Deal desk: reviews, approves, and structures non-standard sales deals. Use when standing up a deal desk, building approval-threshold matrices, designing deal-review packets, routing deals, or auditing deals for compliance.
change-management
Framework for rolling out organizational changes without chaos, using ADKAR adapted for startups. Use when announcing a reorg, switching tools, pivoting strategy, killing a product, or managing change resistance.
chief-of-staff
C-suite orchestration that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s) and runs multi-role board meetings. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, or resolving cross-department conflicts.
chro-advisor
People leadership for scaling companies: hiring, compensation, org structure, performance, and retention. Use when building hiring plans, designing comp frameworks, restructuring teams, or managing performance.
company-os
Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native). Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, or implementing OKRs.