product-tech-influence-article

product-tech-influence-article is a skill for Codex from digoal/blog. It costs 90 tokens per session (1,578 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-2.0.

A writing assistant for producing short, source-backed Chinese articles about a product's technical reputation and influence. It is intended for publication in WeChat-ready Markdown.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you provide a product name and want an evidence-based article about its technical influence. The available details do not specify the exact sources or research process.
Why use it?
It helps turn recent evidence into a concise article from the viewpoint of an independent technical adviser. If there is not enough recent evidence, it stops instead of writing unsupported material.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it when you provide a product name and want an evidence-based article about its technical influence. The available details do not specify the exact sources or research process.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article
View source ↗ digoal/blog
About the project

digoal/blog is a large collection of Chinese-language articles, courses, videos, and practical learning materials about databases, especially PostgreSQL and related systems, along with topics such as AI, open source, business, and finance. It is for database administrators, developers, architects, and others learning database technologies and their applications.

digoal/blog · 8,568 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add digoal/blog --skill product-tech-influence-article
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/digoal/blog

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for product-tech-influence-article

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for product-tech-influence-article

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digoal/blog/product-tech-influence-article.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 90 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,578 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00090 $0.01578
Opus 5 $0.00045 $0.00789
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00316
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00158

Measured 9d ago against content hash 9266cb746354, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

product-tech-influence-article scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/product-tech-influence-article/SKILL.md · 102 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-2.0

The repository is licensed GPL-2.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 102 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 9266cb746354

Subscribe to this mod's changes

product-tech-influence-article is a skill published in the GitHub repository digoal/blog (8,568 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,578 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.