Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to diillson/chatcli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diillson/chatcli/main/.agent/skills/performance-profiling/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/performance-profiling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/performance-profiling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/performance-profiling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00757 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
performance-profiling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to performance-profiling — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Profiling
Measure, analyze, optimize - in that order.
🔧 Runtime Scripts
Execute these for automated profiling:
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/lighthouse_audit.py |
Lighthouse performance audit | python scripts/lighthouse_audit.py https://example.com |
1. Core Web Vitals
Targets
| Metric | Good | Poor | Measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP | < 2.5s | > 4.0s | Loading |
| INP | < 200ms | > 500ms | Interactivity |
| CLS | < 0.1 | > 0.25 | Stability |
When to Measure
| Stage | Tool |
|---|---|
| Development | Local Lighthouse |
| CI/CD | Lighthouse CI |
| Production | RUM (Real User Monitoring) |
2. Profiling Workflow
The 4-Step Process
1. BASELINE → Measure current state
2. IDENTIFY → Find the bottleneck
3. FIX → Make targeted change
4. VALIDATE → Confirm improvement
Profiling Tool Selection
| Problem | Tool |
|---|---|
| Page load | Lighthouse |
| Bundle size | Bundle analyzer |
| Runtime | DevTools Performance |
| Memory | DevTools Memory |
| Network | DevTools Network |
3. Bundle Analysis
What to Look For
| Issue | Indicator |
|---|---|
| Large dependencies | Top of bundle |
| Duplicate code | Multiple chunks |
| Unused code | Low coverage |
| Missing splits | Single large chunk |
Optimization Actions
| Finding | Action |
|---|---|
| Big library | Import specific modules |
| Duplicate deps | Dedupe, update versions |
| Route in main | Code split |
| Unused exports | Tree shake |
4. Runtime Profiling
Performance Tab Analysis
| Pattern | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Long tasks (>50ms) | UI blocking |
| Many small tasks | Possible batching opportunity |
| Layout/paint | Rendering bottleneck |
| Script | JavaScript execution |
Memory Tab Analysis
| Pattern | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Growing heap | Possible leak |
| Large retained | Check references |
| Detached DOM | Not cleaned up |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 5e58efdd8fd9
performance-profiling is a skill published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 757 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to performance-profiling, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
error-recovery
A guide to detecting and recovering from failures in long-running AI agents. It covers API outages, bad tool calls, broken conversation state, stalled streams, repeated loops, retries, fallback models, and circuit breakers that stop repeated failure.
coding-agent-harness
A guide to building the surrounding system that lets an AI agent safely work on code. This system provides tools, rules, tests, feedback, permissions, and ways to undo changes.
04-audit
Audit a codebase read-only across seven quality pillars into one ranked report. Use when the user wants to assess, health-check, or audit a codebase or one pillar. Not for fixing findings, reviewing a change, or checking a feature works.
07-refactor
Improve code across four axes (cleanup, performance, security, architecture) by scanning and fixing, or applying a pushed audit report. Use when the user wants to refactor, optimize, harden, or remove code. Not for read-only diagnosis or adding tests.
03-assert
Assert the work behaves by iterating the project's coding assertions until they pass, plus optional architecture and frontend facets. Use to validate an implementation. Not for reviewing or writing tests.
08-debug
Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.