Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/diillson/chatcli/skill-authoringnpx skills add diillson/chatcli --skill skill-authoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/skill-authoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/skill-authoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/skill-authoring.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00877 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
skill-authoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill Authoring (self-evolving skills)
You can grow your own capabilities. When you learn something reusable, capture it as a
skill with @skill so it auto-activates the next time it's relevant — in this session and every
future one. This is how you get better over time instead of relearning the same thing.
@memory vs @skill — pick the right store
@memory= durable facts about the user/project: "the user prefers tabs", "prod is in us-east-1", "the user's name is Ana". Short, declarative.@skill= a reusable procedure or body of knowledge with triggers: "how to deploy this project", "the team's PR conventions", "how to run the data pipeline". Multi-step, activated by keywords.
If it's a one-line fact → @memory. If it's "how to do X" that you'd want to follow again → @skill.
When to author a skill
Author (or update) a skill when you notice:
- A workflow the user repeated 2+ times, or asked you to "always do it this way".
- A project convention you discovered (build/test/deploy commands, branch naming, lint rules).
- A non-obvious procedure you worked out (a fix, a setup, a sequence of tool calls).
- The user explicitly says "make a skill" / "remember how to do this".
Don't author for one-offs, trivia, or things already covered by an existing skill (update that
one instead — check @skill list / @skill show first).
How to write a good skill
<tool_call name="@skill" args='{"cmd":"create","args":{
"name":"deploy-acme-api",
"description":"How to deploy the Acme API. Use when asked to deploy/ship the Acme API.",
"triggers":["deploy acme","ship the api","release acme"],
"content":"# Deploy Acme API\n\n1. Run the tests: make test\n2. Tag: git tag vX.Y.Z\n3. ...",
"allowed_tools":["@coder","Bash"]
}}' />
Quality bar:
- name: kebab-case, specific (
deploy-acme-api, notdeploy). - description: one line that says what it is and when to use it — this is what decides whether the skill gets activated, so make it precise.
- triggers: the natural phrases a user would say. Include both languages if the user mixes.
- content: concrete, step-by-step, with the actual commands/paths. Write it so a fresh session could follow it. Prefer the OS-independent native tools where possible.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 75 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A ac4423918fe9
skill-authoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (89 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 877 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pptx
从论文、大纲或结构化文本生成 PowerPoint (.pptx) 演示文稿。Use when 用户需要把一篇论文/文章/大纲做成幻灯片、slides、演示文稿、PPT、deck。Don't use when 只需纯文本总结、生成 Word/PDF、或修改已有 pptx 的单个像素级样式。.
ai-style
当任务是用中文撰写或改写面向读者的文案(产品发布稿、公众号文章、邮件、README 等), 或用户反馈文字「AI 味太重」「不像人写的」时,加载本 Skill。.
triage
你是当前任务的分诊协调者。先识别用户的全部目标、顺序依赖和验收条件,再按 “事实检索 → 计算/执行 → 写作”顺序逐步请求切换到需要的专业能力。不要替专业 能力完成它的工作,也不要在信息缺失时臆造结果。.
data_analysis
基于已确认数据执行可审计的数学计算和描述统计。.
coding
编写并运行 Python 代码,验证脚本逻辑和输出。.
aidd-dev:00:sdlc
Pure orchestrator for the full AIDD development flow. Use when a human (or Gardener) needs to take a free-form request from idea to shipped code, end-to-end. Coordinates spec generation, planning, implementation, and review by composing other skills and agents. Holds no business logic of its own — every step is…